Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

243
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
243
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.6K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

938
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
938
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3-Week immobilization vs. no immobilization in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Comparison of functional outcomes between medialized and lateralized reverse shoulder prostheses in acute proximal humerus fractures.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research·2026
Same author

Publication Rate and Discontinuation Percentage of Registered Trials Involving Rotator Cuff Pathology.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

CD7 drives CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

Should tuberosities be reattached in patients over 80 years old treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty after proximal humeral fractures?

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same author

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Ethiopia: findings from the 2022 national population-based survey (second round).

BMC infectious diseases·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
07:22

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft

Published on: June 6, 2025

611

Do we really allow patient decision-making in rotator cuff surgery? A prospective randomized study.

Carlos Torrens1, Joan Miquel2, Fernando Santana3

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, Hospital del Mar, Passeitg Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. 86925@parcdesalutmar.cat.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
|May 1, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Framing rotator cuff tear information impacts patient choices. Presenting surgical benefits led to higher acceptance rates compared to highlighting potential complications.

Keywords:
OutcomesPatient participationRotator cuffRotator cuff-repairShared decision-making

More Related Videos

Development of a Rabbit Chronic-Like Rotator Cuff Injury Model for Study of Fibrosis and Muscular Fatty Degeneration
05:20

Development of a Rabbit Chronic-Like Rotator Cuff Injury Model for Study of Fibrosis and Muscular Fatty Degeneration

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.7K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

861

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
07:22

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft

Published on: June 6, 2025

611
Development of a Rabbit Chronic-Like Rotator Cuff Injury Model for Study of Fibrosis and Muscular Fatty Degeneration
05:20

Development of a Rabbit Chronic-Like Rotator Cuff Injury Model for Study of Fibrosis and Muscular Fatty Degeneration

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.7K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

861

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Patient Communication

Background:

  • Growing patient interest in shared decision-making for medical treatments.
  • Limited guidance on structuring health information for patients.
  • Investigating the impact of information framing on rotator cuff disorder treatment choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if presenting information based on benefits or side effects influences patient decisions regarding rotator cuff surgery.
  • To assess patient willingness to undergo surgery when presented with different informational frames.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective randomized study involving patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tears.
  • Patients were allocated to two groups: Group A (benefit-inform) and Group B (side effect-inform).
  • Participants answered a hypothetical surgery decision question based on their assigned group's information.

Main Results:

  • 80 patients were randomized (43 in Group A, 37 in Group B).
  • Significantly more patients in Group A (84%) accepted surgery compared to Group B (46%).
  • The difference in surgical acceptance between groups was statistically significant (P=0.000).

Conclusions:

  • The manner in which information about rotator cuff disorders is presented significantly affects patient treatment decisions.
  • Emphasizing benefits increases surgical acceptance more than detailing potential complications.