Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Extraction of Non-Protein Amino Acids from Cyanobacteria for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: December 9, 2022
Using labelled internal standards to improve needle trap micro-extraction technique prior to gas chromatography/mass
Denise Biagini1, Tommaso Lomonaco1, Silvia Ghimenti1
1Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 13, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract:
When working with humid gaseous samples, the amount of water vapour collected in a needle trap along with volatile analytes may vary from sample to sample and decrease during the storage. This has a major impact on desorption efficiency and recovery. We propose the addition of a labelled internal standards to nullify the effect of variable humidity on the analytical performance of needle trap micro-extraction combined with gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Triple-bed (Divinylbenzene/Carbopack X/Carboxen 1000) and single-bed (Tenax GR) needles were tested with standard gaseous mixtures prepared at different relative humidity levels (85%, 50% and 10%). The standard mixtures contained twenty-five analytes representative of breath and ambient air constituents, including hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, aromatics, and sulphurs, in the concentration range 0.1-700 ppbv. The two needles showed different behaviours, as recovery was independent of humidity for single-beds, whereas a low recovery (10-20%) was observed when triple-beds trapped very volatile compounds at low humidity (e.g. pentane and ethanol, 10% relative humidity. Triple-beds showed an almost quantitative recovery (>90%) of all the analytes at 50% and 85% relative humidity. This big difference was probably due to the reduced action of water vapour pressure during the desorption step. The addition of 6D-acetone and 8D-toluene to the sorbent material before gas sampling and the normalization of raw data nullified this effect, thereby lowering the variations of analyte recovery at different humidity levels down to 20%. Internal standards were also exploited to limit within 10-20% alterations in peak areas of very volatile compounds during needle storage at room temperature. This variation may results from a loss of water vapour either retained from the sorbent material and/or condensed on triple-bed needle walls. After normalization, the inter- and intra-day precision were halved to 5% and 10% in the case of single-beds, respectively, and to 15% and 20% with three-beds. The addition of an internal standard to the sorbent helps to keep the overall analytical procedure under control and improves the reliability of needle trap micro-extraction for the analysis of volatile organic compounds at ultra-trace levels.
More Related Videos
08:56Quantitative Analysis of the Cellular Lipidome of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 8, 2020
05:52Author Spotlight: Enhanced Histone PTM Isomer Identification Through LC-TIMS-ToF MS/MS and PASEF
Published on: January 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Applications of the Ideal Gas Law: Molar Mass, Density, and Volume
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...