Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant everolimus in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer

Vadim S Koshkin1, Maria C Mir2, Pedro Barata3

  • 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Insights

Neoadjuvant everolimus did not improve pathologic or surgical outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. The study was terminated early due to lack of clinical efficacy and increased PSA levels in most patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • High-risk prostate cancer patients face significant failure risks post-local therapy.
  • No systemic therapy before surgery has improved outcomes.
  • The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently altered in prostate cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus, an mTOR/TORC1 inhibitor.
  • To evaluate everolimus in high-risk prostate cancer patients before radical prostatectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Randomized phase II study of everolimus (5 or 10 mg daily) for 8 weeks pre-surgery.
  • Primary endpoints: pathologic response and surgical outcomes.
  • Secondary endpoints: PSA changes and biomarker expression (mTOR, p4EBP1, pS6, pAKT).

Main Results:

  • Seventeen patients enrolled; no pathologic complete responses observed.
  • 88% of patients experienced increased PSA levels, leading to early termination.
  • Everolimus showed no impact on pathologic response or surgical outcomes.
  • Decreased p4EBP1 expression was noted post-treatment.

Conclusions:

  • Neoadjuvant everolimus did not improve pathologic or surgical outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer.
  • The treatment was associated with increased PSA and lacked clinical efficacy.
  • Adverse events were consistent with prior everolimus studies; no increased surgical complications.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.7K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
403
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K