LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy
Erin L Shropshire1, Mohammad Chaudhry1, Chad M Miller1
1From the Department of Radiology (E.L.S., M.C., C.M.M., B.C.A., E.B., G.L.J., C.Y.K., J.R., M.R.B.), Department of Pathology (D.M.C.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (L.Y.K., M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (G.L.J., M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC; and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.).
The 2017 Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) algorithm shows high predictive value for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment response after bland arterial embolization, though interreader agreement is moderate.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The 2017 Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) introduced a treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
- This algorithm aims to standardize evaluation of treatment response to guide subsequent therapies.
- Validation of the LI-RADS 2017 Treatment Response algorithm in literature is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the LI-RADS 2017 Treatment Response algorithm.
- To assess its accuracy in predicting histopathologic viability of HCC after bland arterial embolization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of patients who underwent bland arterial embolization for HCC and subsequent liver transplantation.
- Three radiologists independently applied the LI-RADS 2017 Treatment Response algorithm to CT/MRI scans.
- Comparison of radiologic assessment with posttransplant histopathology findings.
Main Results:
- The LR-TR Viable category showed 60%-65% accuracy and 86%-96% positive predictive value for predicting incomplete tumor necrosis.
- The LR-TR Nonviable category demonstrated 67%-71% accuracy and 81%-87% negative predictive value for predicting complete tumor necrosis.
- Moderate interreader agreement (κ = 0.55) was observed for the LR-TR category, with 27% of lesions deemed Equivocal.
Conclusions:
- The LI-RADS 2017 Treatment Response algorithm exhibits high predictive value for assessing HCC viability post-bland arterial embolization.
- The algorithm demonstrates moderate interreader association when lesions are categorized as Viable or Nonviable.
- Further validation and refinement may be needed, especially for Equivocal cases.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...


