Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

An Innovative Running Wheel-based Mechanism for Improved Rat Training Performance
Published on: September 19, 2016
Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance
Rodrigo Gomes da Rosa1, Henrique Bianchi Oliveira1, Natalia Andrea Gomeñuka2
1Laboratório de Pesquisa do Exercício, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Background:
Elastic bouncing is a physio-mechanical model that can elucidate running behavior in different situations, including landing and takeoff patterns and the characteristics of the muscle-tendon units during stretch and recoil in running. An increase in running speed improves the body's elastic mechanisms. Although some measures of elastic bouncing are usually carried out, a general description of the elastic mechanism has not been explored in running performance. This study aimed to compare elastic bouncing parameters between the higher- and lower-performing athletes in a 3000 m test.
Methods:
Thirty-eight endurance runners (men) were divided into two groups based on 3000 m performance: the high-performance group (Phigh; n = 19; age: 29 ± 5 years; mass: 72.9 ± 10 kg; stature: 177 ± 8 cm; 3000time: 656 ± 32 s) and the low-performance group (Plow; n = 19; age: 32 ± 6 years; mass: 73.9 ± 7 kg; stature: 175 ± 5 cm; 3000time: 751 ± 29 s). They performed three tests on different days: (i) 3000 m on a track; (ii) incremental running test; and (iii) a running biomechanical test on a treadmill at 13 different speeds from 8 to 20 km h-1. Performance was evaluated using the race time of the 3000 m test. The biomechanics variables included effective contact time (t ce), aerial time (t ae), positive work time (t push), negative work time (t break), step frequency (f step), and elastic system frequency (f sist), vertical displacement (S v) in t ce and t ae (S ce and S ae), vertical force, and vertical stiffness were evaluated in a biomechanical submaximal test on treadmill.
Results:
The t ae, f sist, vertical force and stiffness were higher (p < 0.05) and t ce and f step were lower (p < 0.05) in Phigh, with no differences between groups in t push and t break.
Conclusion:
The elastic bouncing was optimized in runners of the best performance level, demonstrating a better use of elastic components.
Related Concept Videos
The Colonization of Land
Membrane Asymmetry Regulating Transporters
Flippase
Eukaryotic flippases are type-IV P-type ATPases or P4-ATPases belonging to P-type ATPase family proteins that are membrane-bound pumps involved in the ATP-mediated transport of ions and molecules across the membrane. Flippases flip specific phospholipids from the outer to the inner leaflet of a membrane. All P4-ATPases have one...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

