Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Fabrication of Small Caliber Stent-grafts Using Electrospinning and Balloon Expandable Bare Metal Stents
Published on: October 26, 2016
Partially Covered Versus Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents: Coating Nor Diameter Affect Clinical Outcomes
S P Shamah1, C G Chapman2, H Haider2
1Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago Medicine, 5700 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 8043, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. steven.shamah@gmail.com.
Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for malignant biliary obstruction showed no significant differences in efficacy or safety between coated (PCSEMS) and uncoated (USEMS) types, or between 8mm and 10mm diameters.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Interventional Endoscopy
- Biliary Tract Diseases
Background:
- Malignant biliary stricture often presents with jaundice, requiring intervention.
- Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are preferred over plastic stents for longer patency and fewer complications in patients with prognoses exceeding 3 months.
- Existing literature presents conflicting data on the comparative efficacy and safety of different SEMS types and diameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of coated (PCSEMS) versus uncoated (USEMS) self-expanding metal stents.
- To evaluate the impact of stent diameter (8mm vs. 10mm) on clinical outcomes in malignant biliary obstruction management.
- To determine if stent coating or diameter influences clinical success rates and patency duration.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study including 278 patients undergoing ERCP with biliary SEMS placement (8mm and 10mm diameters) between 2009 and 2017.
- Patients were divided into groups based on stent coating (PCSEMS vs. USEMS) and diameter.
- Comparison of clinical success rates, patency duration, and adverse event rates between the different SEMS types and diameters.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in clinical success rates between PCSEMS (98.1%) and USEMS (95.5%).
- Patency duration was not significantly different between PCSEMS (302.5 days) and USEMS (225.5 days).
- Stent diameter (8mm vs. 10mm) also showed no impact on overall clinical success or patency duration.
Conclusions:
- Stent coating (PCSEMS vs. USEMS) did not demonstrate a significant difference in clinical efficacy or adverse events.
- Stent diameter (8mm vs. 10mm) did not impact clinical success or patency duration in managing malignant biliary obstruction.
- Findings suggest that stent coating and size may not be critical factors in SEMS selection for this indication, contrary to some prior suggestions.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction
Properties of Transition Metals
The Influence of Affect on Cognition
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Bonding in Metals
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....

