Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Assessing Stomatal Response to Live Bacterial Cells using Whole Leaf Imaging
Published on: October 2, 2010
Bacterial infection systemically suppresses stomatal density
Christian Dutton1,2, Hanna Hõrak1, Christopher Hepworth1,3
1Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Abstract:
Many plant pathogens gain entry to their host via stomata. On sensing attack, plants close these pores to restrict pathogen entry. Here, we show that plants exhibit a second longer term stomatal response to pathogens. Following infection, the subsequent development of leaves is altered via a systemic signal. This reduces the density of stomata formed, thus providing fewer entry points for pathogens on new leaves. Arabidopsis thaliana leaves produced after infection by a bacterial pathogen that infects through the stomata (Pseudomonas syringae) developed larger epidermal pavement cells and stomata and consequently had up to 20% reductions in stomatal density. The bacterial peptide flg22 or the phytohormone salicylic acid induced similar systemic reductions in stomatal density suggesting that they might mediate this effect. In addition, flagellin receptors, salicylic acid accumulation, and the lipid transfer protein AZI1 were all required for this developmental response. Furthermore, manipulation of stomatal density affected the level of bacterial colonization, and plants with reduced stomatal density showed slower disease progression. We propose that following infection, development of new leaves is altered by a signalling pathway with some commonalities to systemic acquired resistance. This acts to reduce the potential for future infection by providing fewer stomatal openings.
Related Concept Videos
Gram-negative Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems
Bacterial Signaling
Density
Current Density
Second Order systems II
Bacterial Transformation
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...

