Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens
Published on: January 21, 2019
A network approach to developing immuno-oncology combinations in Canada
V Higenell1, R Fajzel1, G Batist1,2
1Exactis Innovation, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
Abstract:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized care for many cancer indications, with considerable effort now being focused on increasing the rate, depth, and duration of patient response. One strategy is to combine immune strategies (for example, ctla-4 and PD-1/L1-directed agents) to harness additive or synergistic efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Despite encouraging results with such combinations in multiple tumour types, numerous clinical challenges remain, including a lack of biomarkers that reliably predict outcome, the emergence of therapeutic resistance, and optimal management of immune-related toxicities. Furthermore, the selection of ideal combinations from the myriad of immune, systemic, and locoregional therapies has yet to be determined. A longitudinal network-based approach could offer advantages in addressing those critical questions, including long-term follow-up of patients beyond individual trials. The molecular cancer registry Personalize My Treatment, managed by the Networks of Centres of Excellence nonprofit organization Exactis Innovation, is uniquely positioned to accelerate Canadian immuno-oncology (io) research efforts throughout its national network of cancer sites. To gain deeper insight into how a pan-Canadian network could advance research in io combinations, Exactis invited preeminent clinical and scientific advisors from across Canada to a roundtable event in November 2017. The present white paper captures the expert advice provided: leverage longitudinal patient data collection; facilitate network collaboration and assay harmonization; synergize with existing initiatives, networks, and biobanks; and develop an io combination trial based on Canadian discoveries.
Insights
Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors shows promise for cancer treatment. A Canadian network approach using longitudinal data can address challenges like resistance and toxicity, advancing immuno-oncology research.
Area of Science:
- Immuno-oncology (IO) research
- Cancer therapeutics
- Biomarker discovery
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer care, but improving response rates and duration remains crucial.
- Combining therapies like CTLA-4 and PD-1/L1 inhibitors offers potential synergistic efficacy but faces challenges.
- Key challenges include predicting patient outcomes, overcoming therapeutic resistance, and managing immune-related toxicities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore how a pan-Canadian network can advance immuno-oncology combination research.
- To identify strategies for addressing clinical challenges in IO combination therapy.
- To leverage longitudinal patient data for deeper insights into treatment efficacy and resistance.
Main Methods:
- A roundtable event convened Canadian clinical and scientific advisors in November 2017.
- Discussion focused on leveraging the Personalize My Treatment molecular cancer registry.
- Expert advice centered on data collection, network collaboration, and assay harmonization.
Main Results:
- Expert advice emphasized leveraging longitudinal patient data collection for long-term follow-up.
- Facilitating network collaboration and assay harmonization is key to advancing research.
- Synergizing with existing initiatives and developing Canadian-led IO combination trials were recommended.
Conclusions:
- A longitudinal network-based approach can address critical questions in immuno-oncology combinations.
- The Personalize My Treatment registry is well-positioned to accelerate Canadian IO research.
- Recommendations include data sharing, collaborative efforts, and developing novel combination trials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Network Function of a Circuit
Sustainable Development

