Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in proton therapy using dual energy CT
Arthur Lalonde1,2, Yunhe Xie3, Brendan Burgdorf4
1Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an intravenous (IV) contrast agent on proton therapy dose calculation using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Two DECT methods are considered. The first one, [Formula: see text], attempts to accurately predict the proton stopping powers relative to water (SPR) of contrast enhanced (CE) DECT images, while the second generates a virtual non-contrast (VNC) volume that can be processed as a native non-contrast (NC) one. Both methods are compared against single-energy computed tomography (SECT). The accuracy of SPR predicted for different concentrations of IV contrast diluted in water is first evaluated using simulated data. Results then are validated in an experimental set-up comparing SPR predictions for both NC and CE images to measurements made with a multi-layer ionisation chamber (MLIC). Finally, the impact of IV contrast on dose calculation using both SECT and DECT is evaluated for one liver and one head and neck patient. Using simulated data, DECT is shown to be less sensitive to the presence of IV contrast than SECT, although the performance of the [Formula: see text] method is sensitive to the level of beam hardening considered. For different concentrations of IV contrast diluted in water, experimental MLIC measurement of SPR agrees with DECT predictions within 3% while SECT introduce errors above 20%. This error in the SPR value results in a range error of up to 3.2 mm (2.6%) for proton beams calculated on SECT CE patient images. The error is reduced below 1 mm using DECT with the [Formula: see text] and VNC methods. Globally, it is observed that the influence of IV contrast on proton therapy dose calculation is mitigated using DECT over SECT. In patient anatomies, the VNC approach provides the best agreement with the reference dose distribution.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
11:27Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Dendrimer-based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: December 4, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Nuclear Binding Energy
What is Energy?
Calculating pH Changes in a Buffer Solution
Gibbs Free Energy
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States