Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
Published on: October 6, 2023
The MEDEA FAR-EAST Study: Conceptual framework, methods and first findings of a multicenter cross-sectional
Sophia Hoschar1,2, Jiangqi Pan3, Zhen Wang3
1Institute of Epidemiology II, Mental Health Research Unit, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstädter Landstr 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Insights
Prolonged prehospital delay in Chinese acute myocardial infarction patients is a significant issue. Key barriers include symptom mismatch, denial, and psychological factors, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Psychology
Background:
- Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are rising in China, necessitating improved preventive strategies.
- Prolonged prehospital delay (PHD) hinders timely treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Global efforts to reduce patient decision-making time for AMI have shown limited success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the framework and methods of the MEDEA FAR-EAST Study.
- To identify in-depth barriers contributing to prehospital delay in Chinese AMI patients.
- To assess clinical and psychological factors influencing delay.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter, cross-sectional observational study.
- Data collected via bedside interview, self-administered questionnaire, and patient charts.
- Standardized procedures ensured uniform data collection by trained personnel.
Main Results:
- 296 eligible patients (78.1%) from 379 screened.
- Median PHD was 151 minutes; 69.7% had symptom mismatch.
- 39.0% did not attribute symptoms to cardiac origin; psychological factors like denial (53.2%) were prevalent.
Conclusions:
- First study on PHD in Chinese AMI patients emphasizing psychological variables.
- Successfully implemented comprehensive assessment tool for clinical and psychological factors.
- Identified cardiac denial and symptom mismatch as key barriers, enabling future research and inter-cultural comparisons.
Background:
The substantial increase in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in China over the last three decades warrants comprehensive preventive primary and secondary strategies. Prolonged prehospital delay (PHD) has been identified as a substantial barrier to timely therapeutic interventions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite worldwide efforts to decrease the patient's decision-making time, minimal change has been achieved so far. Here, we aim to describe the conceptual framework and methods and outline key data of the MEDEA FAR-EAST Study, which aimed to elucidate in-depth barriers contributing to delay in Chinese AMI-patients.
Methods:
Data sources of this multicenter cross-sectional observational study are a standardized bedside interview, a self-administered tailored questionnaire tool and the patient chart. PHD was defined as the main outcome and triangulated at bedside. Standard operation procedures ensured uniform data collection by trained study personnel. The study was ethically approved by Tongji-Hospital and applied to all participating hospitals.
Results:
Among 379 consecutively screened patients, 296 (78.1%) fulfilled eligibility criteria. A total of 241 (81.4%) AMI-patients were male and 55 (18.6%) female. Mean age was 62.9 years. Prehospital delay time was assessed for 294 (99.3%) patients. Overall median PHD was 151 min with no significant sex difference. Symptom mismatch was present in 200 (69.7%) patients and 106 (39.0%) patients did not attribute their symptoms to cardiac origin. A total of 33 (12.4%) patients suffered from depression, 31 (11.7%) from anxiety and 141 (53.2%) patients employed denial as their major coping style.
Conclusion:
This is the first study on prehospital delay with emphasis on psychological variables in Chinese AMI-patients. A comprehensive assessment tool to measure clinical and psychological factors was successfully implemented. Socio-demographic key data proved a good fit into preexisting Chinese literature. Potential barriers including cardiac denial and symptom-mismatch were assessed for the first time in Chinese AMI-patients. The pretested selection of instruments allows future in depth investigations into barriers to delay of Chinese AMI-patients and enables inter-cultural comparisons.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Method of Sections

