Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
Evaluating the Utility of a Postprocessing Algorithm for MRI Evaluation of Optic Neuritis
L Stunkel1, A Sharma2, M S Parsons2
1From the Department of Neurology (L.S.).
Background And Purpose:
MR imaging is useful for the detection and/or confirmation of optic neuritis. The objective of this study was to determine whether a postprocessing algorithm selectively increases the contrast-to-noise ratio of abnormal optic nerves in optic neuritis, facilitating this diagnosis on MR imaging.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective case-control study, coronal FLAIR images and coronal contrast-enhanced T1WI from 44 patients (31 eyes with clinically confirmed optic neuritis and 28 control eyes) underwent processing using a proprietary postprocessing algorithm designed to detect and visually highlight regions of contiguous increases in signal intensity by increasing the signal intensities of regions that exceed a predetermined threshold. For quantitative evaluation of the effect on image processing, the contrast-to-noise ratio of equivalent ROIs and the contrast-to-noise ratio between optic nerves and normal-appearing white matter were measured on baseline and processed images. The effect of image-processing on diagnostic performance was evaluated by masked reviews of baseline and processed images by 6 readers with varying experience levels.
Results:
In abnormal nerves, processing resulted in an increase in the median contrast-to-noise ratio from 17.8 to 85.0 (P < .001) on FLAIR and from 19.4 to 93.7 (P < .001) on contrast-enhanced images. The contrast-to-noise ratio for control optic nerves was not affected by processing (P = 0.13). Image processing had a beneficial effect on radiologists' diagnostic performance, with an improvement in sensitivities for 5/6 readers and relatively unchanged specificities. Interobserver agreement improved following processing.
Conclusions:
Processing resulted in a selective increase in the contrast-to-noise ratio for diseased nerves and corresponding improvement in the detection of optic neuritis on MR imaging by radiologists.
Insights
A new postprocessing algorithm significantly enhances the contrast-to-noise ratio for abnormal optic nerves in MR imaging. This improves the detection of optic neuritis by radiologists, aiding in diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Neurology
Background:
- Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is crucial for diagnosing optic neuritis.
- Enhancing image quality can improve diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a postprocessing algorithm's ability to increase contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in optic neuritis detection.
- To determine if the algorithm facilitates diagnosis on MR imaging.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study of 44 patients (31 with optic neuritis, 28 control eyes).
- Coronal FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1WI images processed using a proprietary algorithm.
- Quantitative analysis of CNR and qualitative assessment of diagnostic performance by 6 radiologists.
Main Results:
- Processing significantly increased median CNR in abnormal nerves (FLAIR: 17.8 to 85.0; contrast-enhanced: 19.4 to 93.7).
- CNR in control nerves remained unaffected (P = 0.13).
- Radiologists' diagnostic performance improved, with enhanced sensitivity for 5/6 readers and improved interobserver agreement.
Conclusions:
- The algorithm selectively enhances CNR in diseased optic nerves.
- This processing improves MR imaging detection of optic neuritis, aiding radiologists in diagnosis.
More Related Videos
10:26A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
07:33In Vivo Evaluation of Fracture Callus Development During Bone Healing in Mice Using an MRI-compatible Osteosynthesis Device for the Mouse Femur
Published on: November 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Trial and Error and Algorithm