Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing01:05

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

12.7K
In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
12.7K
Power Dissipated in a Circuit: Problem Solving01:15

Power Dissipated in a Circuit: Problem Solving

1.6K
The equivalent resistance of a combination of resistors depends on their values and how they are connected.
The simplest combinations of resistors are series and parallel connections. In a series circuit, the first resistor's output current flows into the second resistor's input; therefore, each resistor's current is the same. Thus, the equivalent resistance is the algebraic sum of the resistances. The current through the circuit can be found from Ohm's law and is equal to the...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twist-tuned exchange and hysteresis in a bilayer van der Waals magnet.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Excitons in van der Waals magnetic materials.

Nature materials·2026
Same author

Exciton transport driven by spin excitations in an antiferromagnet.

Nature nanotechnology·2025
Same author

Magnon-polaron control in a surface magnetoacoustic wave resonator.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Spin Seebeck in the weakly exchange-coupled Van der Waals antiferromagnet across the spin-flip transition.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Magnon-mediated exciton-exciton interaction in a van der Waals antiferromagnet.

Nature materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures
09:12

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures

Published on: August 10, 2017

7.9K

Anisotropic and Controllable Gilbert-Bloch Dissipation in Spin Valves.

Akashdeep Kamra1, Dmytro M Polishchuk2, Vladislav Korenivski2

  • 1Center for Quantum Spintronics, Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Physical Review Letters
|May 4, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Researchers found a way to control magnetic damping in spin valves by changing the fixed layer magnetization angle. This tuning is crucial for spintronic devices like read heads and oscillators.

More Related Videos

Grafting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Polystyrene to Enable Self-Assembly and Anisotropic Patchiness
11:09

Grafting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Polystyrene to Enable Self-Assembly and Anisotropic Patchiness

Published on: April 1, 2018

8.5K
Dissipative Microgravimetry to Study the Binding Dynamics of the Phospholipid Binding Protein Annexin A2 to Solid-supported Lipid Bilayers Using a Quartz Resonator
07:11

Dissipative Microgravimetry to Study the Binding Dynamics of the Phospholipid Binding Protein Annexin A2 to Solid-supported Lipid Bilayers Using a Quartz Resonator

Published on: November 1, 2018

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures
09:12

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures

Published on: August 10, 2017

7.9K
Grafting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Polystyrene to Enable Self-Assembly and Anisotropic Patchiness
11:09

Grafting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Polystyrene to Enable Self-Assembly and Anisotropic Patchiness

Published on: April 1, 2018

8.5K
Dissipative Microgravimetry to Study the Binding Dynamics of the Phospholipid Binding Protein Annexin A2 to Solid-supported Lipid Bilayers Using a Quartz Resonator
07:11

Dissipative Microgravimetry to Study the Binding Dynamics of the Phospholipid Binding Protein Annexin A2 to Solid-supported Lipid Bilayers Using a Quartz Resonator

Published on: November 1, 2018

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Spintronics
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Background:

  • Spin valves are fundamental components in spintronic devices.
  • Magnetic damping in the free layer affects device performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dependence of magnetic damping on magnetization angle in spin valves.
  • To explore methods for tuning magnetic damping in situ.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of spin pumping-mediated damping.
  • Investigation of anisotropic and tensorial damping terms.
  • Consideration of Gilbert- and Bloch-like damping.

Main Results:

  • Magnetic damping is anisotropic and depends on the relative magnetization angle.
  • A mechanism to tune free layer damping via fixed layer magnetization orientation was identified.
  • Damping can be tuned from negligible to large values, especially with insulating magnets.

Conclusions:

  • The orientation of fixed layer magnetization offers an in situ method to control free layer damping.
  • The Bloch damping contribution from spin accumulation is significant.
  • Understanding this tuning mechanism is vital for advancing spintronic device design.