Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Dosimetric Impact of Image-Guided Radiotherapy in Liver Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Cynthia L Eccles1, Patricia E Lindsay1, Tim D Craig1
1Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Introduction:
In the absence of volumetric image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) with or without intravenous contrast, IGRT with two-dimensional (2D) imaging can improve the accuracy and precision of radiation delivery by correcting the largest sources of geometric uncertainty, facilitating the delivery of higher doses to the tumor and/or reduced doses to normal tissues. The purpose of this work was to estimate dosimetric impact of 2D IGRT for patients undergoing breath hold liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
Materials/Methods:
Offline residual offsets were determined using orthogonal image pairs acquired with patients positioned with external setup marks (non-IGRT) and following IGRT and repositioning (IGRT) for 30 patients treated with 6-fraction liver SBRT. The diaphragm was used as a surrogate for the liver for craniocaudal positioning, and the vertebral bodies for anterioposterior and right-left positioning, with a 3-mm threshold. The planned dose distributions were shifted by the measured IGRT and non-IGRT offsets. Total doses to target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were calculated and compared to the prescribed plans.
Results:
A total of 643 images (416-MV electronic portal images; 227 kV cone beam computed tomography projection images) were evaluated. Residual non-IGRT offsets frequently exceeded 3 mm (72%), resulting in clinically significant variations from the prescribed minimum planning target volume dose (mean change -6.5 Gy; P =.0150). The population mean reductions in minimum gross tumor volume doses (standard deviation (σ) to 0.5 mL with were 7.2 Gy (6.3) and 4.7 Gy (6.1) for non-IGRT and IGRT, respectively. The mean population increase in maximum OAR dose (to 0.5 mL) was largest for bowel (2.7 Gy, σ = 5.5 Gy) for non-IGRT.
Conclusions:
IGRT significantly improves concordance of delivered doses with planned doses for liver target volumes and OARs.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Types of Impact
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
Impact: Problem Solving
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
Impact of Groups on Individuals

