Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026
A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay
Published on: June 30, 2020
Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Who Really Benefits?
Matthew E Oetgen1, Elise M McNulty2, Allison L Matthews3
1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Study Design:
Retrospective case analysis.
Objectives:
Evaluate the cost difference between magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and traditional growing rod (TGR) surgeries at initial implantation and determine the recipient of cost savings.
Summary Of Background Data:
Treatment of early-onset scoliosis is challenging and costly, with growing rods (GRs) becoming a standard treatment. Although both effectively control deformity, TGR requires repeat surgical lengthening and MCGR does not. Previous cost analyses have suggested that MCGR results in lower overall cost after 3 years because of the elimination of repeat surgeries; however, the benefactor of these savings is unclear.
Methods:
All patients who underwent initial GR implantation from May 2011 to January 2016 at a tertiary care children's hospital were included (37 cases: 16 MCGR and 21 TGR; 4 TGR to MCGR conversions). Financial information was analyzed including insurance provider, and amount billed to and reimbursed from payer. Charges at the time of implantation were divided into categories (surgery time, room/board, anesthesia, implant cost, lab, radiology, therapy, medications, neuromonitoring, operating room materials, and recovery room). Variables were compared using t-tests to determine differences overall and per category.
Results:
The average overall charge for MCGR implantation was 1.5 times greater than TGR implementation (p = .04). Average charges were statistically similar across all categories, except implant costs, which were significantly higher for MCGR (MCGR: $31,621 vs. TGR: $8,966, p < .0001). The average percentage reimbursement of total charges were similar between surgeries (MCGR 43% vs. TGR 46%, p = .26).
Conclusions:
MCGR implantation has a significantly higher charge than TGR, secondary to the higher expense of MCGR implants. Despite this, total institutional reimbursement is similar between the two procedures. Although MCGRs have been shown to be "cost effective" after 3 years, our findings suggest health care institutions bear the cost of this new technology while payers gain the long-term financial benefit.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, economic analysis.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Benefits of Self-Esteem
03:02Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
02:19Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
03:26Framing Effects
01:30Magnetism
An individual magnetic pole cannot be isolated. No matter how small, every piece of a magnet contains a north pole and a south...
01:21Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...