Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
Technical note: Evaluation of interval between measurements and calculation method for the quantification of enteric
Rong Wang1, Min Wang2, Xiu Min Zhang2
1CAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, South Central Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in the Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Abstract:
Respiration chambers share one analyzer working in parallel, and methane (CH4) concentrations have to be measured at certain intervals. The maximum and minimum values in the kinetics of CH4 emissions can be missed during the interval between measurements, which may influence the quantification of CH4 emissions. Chambers must be opened for morning feeding and cleaning, which causes a loss of CH4 data. Calculation methods are needed to estimate the lost CH4 emission data, which may influence the estimated amount of daily CH4 emissions. In this study, we measured the CH4 emissions of 10 growing Chinese Holstein dairy heifers in respiration chambers. Methane concentrations were measured every 0.5 min to obtain the 23-h kinetics of CH4 emissions, which were further selected at different intervals between measurements (i.e., 5, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min) to evaluate the effects of interval on quantification of CH4 emissions. The missing 1-h kinetics of CH4 emissions before feeding were not measured, and 2 calculation methods were used to estimate the missing 1-h kinetics of CH4 emissions: mean value of measuring period (the mean method) and the nearest value of measurement just before chamber opening (the nearest method). The results showed that the rates of CH4 emission from 10 heifers varied from 4.56 to 11.42 g/h. The increment of intervals decreased maximum rate of CH4 emission and increased minimum rate of CH4 emission. Interval caused less than 5% of the difference in measuring CH4 emissions. Although the mean method had greater estimated daily CH4 emission than the nearest method, the difference was within 3%. The interval between measurements (≤3 h) and calculation method had little influence on enteric CH4 emission measurements.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Interval Level of Measurement
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
Measuring Reaction Rates
Critical Numbers and the Closed Interval Method
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Emission Spectra

