Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Applications in Nanoparticle Synthesis Through Laser Ablation in Liquids
Published on: June 16, 2023
Surface Ablation Versus CIRCLE for Myopic Enhancement After SMILE: A Matched Comparative Study
This study compared surface ablation and CIRCLE enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Both methods showed similar refractive outcomes at 3 months, but CIRCLE offered faster visual recovery.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
Background:
- Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a popular refractive surgery procedure.
- Enhancement procedures may be necessary to correct residual refractive errors after primary SMILE.
- Surface ablation and the VisuMax CIRCLE option are two methods for SMILE enhancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of SMILE enhancement using surface ablation versus the VisuMax CIRCLE option.
- To evaluate refractive and functional results, safety, and efficacy of both enhancement techniques.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective matched analysis compared eyes undergoing surface ablation enhancement with mitomycin C versus CIRCLE enhancement.
- Data from 2,803 SMILE procedures were screened, resulting in 24 eyes (12 per group) for analysis.
- Outcomes were assessed at a 3-month follow-up, including uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA/CDVA) and mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE).
Main Results:
- Both surface ablation and CIRCLE enhancement achieved comparable refractive accuracy and efficacy at 3 months.
- UDVA and CDVA showed similar improvements, with no significant difference in safety or efficacy indices.
- Eyes enhanced with CIRCLE demonstrated significantly faster visual recovery at 1 week compared to surface ablation.
Conclusions:
- Surface ablation and CIRCLE enhancement after SMILE yield comparable refractive and functional outcomes at 3 months.
- The CIRCLE option offers a faster visual recovery compared to surface ablation.
- This is the first study directly comparing these two enhancement methods after SMILE.
More Related Videos
09:41Emission Spectroscopic Boundary Layer Investigation during Ablative Material Testing in Plasmatron
Published on: June 9, 2016
11:47Characterization of Surface Modifications by White Light Interferometry: Applications in Ion Sputtering, Laser Ablation, and Tribology Experiments
Published on: February 27, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Mohr's Circle for Moments of Inertia: Problem Solving
Consider a rectangular beam. The moments of inertia of the beam about the x and y axis are 2.5(107) mm4 and 7.5(107) mm4, respectively. The product of inertia is 1.5(107) mm4. Determine the principal moments of inertia and the orientation of the major and...
Mohr's Circle for Plane Stress
Consider a set of Cartesian coordinates. The horizontal and vertical axes correspond to normal stress (σ) and shearing stress (τ), respectively. Two points, points A and B, are defined by the normal and shear...
Mohr's Circle for Plane Strain
Mohr's circle visually represents the strain states under various conditions, which is essential for...
Mohr's Circle for Moments of Inertia
Frost Circles for Different Conjugated Systems