Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

65.5K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
65.5K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

261.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
261.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.9K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.9K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

87.6K
Scientific Laws
87.6K
Plant Cell Wall02:43

Plant Cell Wall

60.2K
The plant cell wall gives plant cells shape, support, and protection. As a cell matures, its cell wall specializes according to the cell type. For example, the parenchyma cells of leaves possess only a thin, primary cell wall.
60.2K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

17.3K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
17.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Why Should You Trust Research Published in <i>Psychological Science</i>?

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Sports Metaresearch: An Emerging Discipline of Sport Science and Medicine.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

The prevalence of direct replication articles in top-ranking psychology journals.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

An empirical appraisal of eLife's assessment vocabulary.

PLoS biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
06:50

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment

Published on: December 29, 2014

12.4K

Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall.

Alexa M Tullett1, Simine Vazire2

  • 1Department of Psychology,University of Alabama,Tuscaloosa,AL 35487-0348.alexa.tullett@gmail.comhttp://alexatullett.com.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|May 9, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Scientific progress is often misconstrued. We propose viewing scientific advancement as solving a jigsaw puzzle, rather than building a wall, to better value replication research.

More Related Videos

Fluorescent Immunolocalization of Arabinogalactan Proteins and Pectins in the Cell Wall of Plant Tissues
10:14

Fluorescent Immunolocalization of Arabinogalactan Proteins and Pectins in the Cell Wall of Plant Tissues

Published on: February 27, 2021

6.8K
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment
06:50

The Use of the Puzzle Box as a Means of Assessing the Efficacy of Environmental Enrichment

Published on: December 29, 2014

12.4K
Fluorescent Immunolocalization of Arabinogalactan Proteins and Pectins in the Cell Wall of Plant Tissues
10:14

Fluorescent Immunolocalization of Arabinogalactan Proteins and Pectins in the Cell Wall of Plant Tissues

Published on: February 27, 2021

6.8K
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.5K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • The prevailing "building a wall" analogy for scientific progress.
  • This analogy undervalues replication research by framing it as destructive.
  • Original research is often perceived as constructive ('laying bricks').

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the "building a wall" analogy of scientific progress.
  • To propose a more accurate and inclusive analogy for scientific advancement.
  • To reframe the perceived value of replication studies in science.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of scientific progress analogies.
  • Critique of the "building a wall" metaphor in scientific discourse.
  • Proposal of an alternative metaphor for scientific progress.

Main Results:

  • The "building a wall" analogy inaccurately represents scientific progress.
  • Replication research is unfairly characterized as destructive.
  • Original research is privileged over essential validation studies.

Conclusions:

  • The "building a wall" analogy is a flawed model for scientific progress.
  • An alternative analogy, such as solving a jigsaw puzzle, better reflects the cumulative and integrative nature of science.
  • Adopting a new analogy can help re-evaluate and promote the importance of replication research.