Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
Analysis of Outcomes in Ischemic vs Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From
Ramon Corbalan1, Jean-Pierre Bassand2,3, Laura Illingworth3
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Catholic University School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile.
Insights
Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) had higher death and major bleeding rates than those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Treatment strategies varied between groups, impacting outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) frequently co-occurs with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF).
- The etiology of cardiomyopathy in patients with AF may influence treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate treatment strategies and 1-year clinical outcomes.
- To compare outcomes between patients with newly diagnosed AF and CHF stratified by ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the prospective, noninterventional GARFIELD-AF registry (N=11,738).
- Patients with newly diagnosed AF and CHF were categorized into ICM and NICM groups.
- One-year follow-up assessed rates of death, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding.
Main Results:
- Patients with ICM received oral anticoagulants less frequently and antiplatelets alone more frequently than those with NICM.
- Rates of all-cause death (10.2 vs 7.0 per 100 person-years) and cardiovascular death (5.1 vs 2.9 per 100 person-years) were significantly higher in the ICM group.
- Major bleeding rates were also significantly higher in the ICM group (1.1 vs 0.7 per 100 person-years).
Conclusions:
- Treatment patterns for antithrombotic and heart failure therapies differed between ICM and NICM patients.
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with AF and CHF is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality and bleeding risk.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering cardiomyopathy etiology in managing patients with AF and CHF.
Importance:
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is commonly associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and their combination may affect treatment strategies and outcomes.
Objective:
To assess the treatment strategies and 1-year clinical outcomes of antithrombotic and CHF therapies for patients with newly diagnosed AF with concomitant CHF stratified by etiology (ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM] vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM]).
Design, Setting, And Participants:
The GARFIELD-AF registry is a prospective, noninterventional registry. A total of 52 014 patients with AF were enrolled between March 2010 and August 2016. A total of 11 738 patients 18 years and older with newly diagnosed AF (≤6 weeks' duration) and at least 1 investigator-determined stroke risk factor were included. Data were analyzed from December 2017 to September 2018.
Exposures:
One-year follow-up rates of death, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding were assessed.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Event rates per 100 person-years were estimated from the Poisson model and Cox hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
The median age of the population was 71.0 years, 22 987 of 52 013 were women (44.2%) and 31 958 of 52 014 were white (61.4%). Of 11 738 patients with CHF, 4717 (40.2%) had ICM and 7021 (59.8%) had NICM. Prescription of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs was not balanced between groups. Oral anticoagulants with or without antiplatelet drugs were used in 2753 patients with ICM (60.1%) and 5082 patients with NICM (73.7%). Antiplatelets were prescribed alone in 1576 patients with ICM (34.4%) and 1071 patients with NICM (15.5%). Compared with patients with NICM, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (72.6% [3439] vs 60.3% [4236]) and of β blockers (63.3% [2988] vs 53.2% [3737]) was higher in patients with ICM. Rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death per 100 patient-years were significantly higher in the ICM group (all-cause death: ICM, 10.2; 95% CI, 9.2-11.1; NICM, 7.0; 95% CI, 6.4-7.6; cardiovascular death: ICM, 5.1; 95% CI, 4.5-5.9; NICM, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.5-3.4). Stroke/systemic embolism rates tended to be higher in ICM groups compared with NICM groups (ICM, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.5; NICM, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9). Major bleeding rates were significantly higher in the ICM group (1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.4) compared with the NICM group (0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Patients with ICM received oral anticoagulants with or without antiplatelet drugs less frequently and antiplatelets alone more frequently than patients with NICM, but they received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more often than patients with NICM. All-cause and cardiovascular death rates were higher in patients with ICM than patients with NICM.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01090362.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...
Amyloid Fibrils
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Data Reporting and Recording

