Differential Impact of Appropriate Use Criteria on the Association between Age and an Abnormal Stress Myocardial
Saurabh Malhotra1,2, Rami Doukky1,2
1Division of Cardiology, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL.
Insights
Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for coronary artery disease (CAD) testing did not predict abnormal SPECT MPI results in elderly patients. Caution is advised when using AUC for referring older adults for this cardiac imaging.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Geriatrics
Background:
- Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) are established for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD).
- The diagnostic yield of AUC in elderly populations for CAD prediction remains unclear.
- SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a key diagnostic tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if AUC for SPECT MPI preserves its diagnostic yield in predicting CAD among elderly patients.
- To assess the relationship between AUC and abnormal SPECT MPI findings in different age groups.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort of 1511 patients undergoing outpatient SPECT MPI was analyzed.
- Study appropriateness was determined using 2013 multimodality AUC for ischemic heart disease.
- Abnormal SPECT MPI was defined by specific summed stress and difference scores.
Main Results:
- Age ≥ 60 years, male gender, hypertension, diabetes, and known CAD predicted abnormal SPECT MPI.
- Appropriate indication for testing did not predict abnormal SPECT MPI in the elderly.
- Among elderly patients, appropriateness of testing did not influence the prevalence of abnormal SPECT MPI or ischemia.
Conclusions:
- AUC did not discriminate the risk of abnormal SPECT MPI in the elderly cohort.
- Relying solely on AUC for referring elderly patients for SPECT MPI requires caution.
- Further research may be needed to refine AUC for geriatric cardiac diagnostics.
Background:
The diagnostic and prognostic value of appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. Whether the diagnostic yield of AUC for predicting CAD is preserved among the elderly is not known.
Methods:
We analyzed a multi-site prospective cohort of 1511 consecutive patients (mean age 59 ±13 years, 57% males) who underwent outpatient, community-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Appropriateness of the studies was determined based on the 2013 multimodality AUC for detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease. An abnormal SPECT MPI was defined by either a summed stress score ≥ 4 or a summed difference score ≥ 2.
Results:
Abnormal SPECT MPI was present in 190 patients (12.5%), while ischemia on MPI alone was present in 122 (8%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 60 years, male gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and known CAD were independent predictors of an abnormal SPET MPI, while appropriate indication of testing was not. Age ≥ 60 years was also an independent predictor of inducible myocardial ischemia, while appropriate indication for testing was not. Among elderly (≥ 60 year), regardless of appropriateness of testing, there was no difference in the prevalence of an abnormal SPECT (19% vs. 14%, p=0.14) or prevalence of SPECT ischemia (11% vs. 11%, p=1.00). Among younger patients however, appropriate testing predicted a greater prevalence of an abnormal SPECT (12% vs. 7%, p=0.013).
Conclusion:
In this multi-site cohort, testing based on AUC did not discriminate the risk of an abnormal SPECT MPI among the elderly. Caution is advised when relying on AUC for referring elderly patients for SPECT MPI.
More Related Videos
06:58Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Abnormal Proliferation
Responses to Salt Stress
Impact of Groups on Groups
