Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Considering the research: Commentary on "The trait-type dialectic: Construct validity, clinical utility, and the

Thomas A Widiger1

  • 1University of Kentucky.

Personality Disorders
|May 10, 2019
PubMed
Summary

The dimensional approach to personality disorders is gaining favor due to empirical evidence. This model offers clear diagnoses, facilitates communication among professionals, and explains interpersonal dynamics effectively.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bipolarity of maladaptive personality traits in the alternative model of personality disorders.

Personality disorders·2025
Same author

Introduction to special section: Treatment of antagonism.

Personality disorders·2025
Same author

Cross-cultural validity of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 across nine countries and validation of a French translation.

Personality disorders·2025
Same author

Personality Disorders: Current Conceptualizations and Challenges.

Annual review of clinical psychology·2025
Same author

Different routes to the same destination? Comparing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Section II- and alternative model of personality disorder-defined borderline personality disorder.

Personality disorders·2024
Same author

The Development of the Five-Factor Schizoid Inventory.

Assessment·2023

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • The debate between dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders is ongoing.
  • Dr. Bornstein represents a prominent faction favoring a specific perspective within this debate.
  • This commentary addresses whether Bornstein's perspective adequately reflects empirical research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the empirical support for the dimensional versus categorical approaches to personality disorders.
  • To discuss the utility and implications of the dimensional trait models in clinical practice.
  • To advocate for increased collaboration between trait and dynamic clinicians.

Main Methods:

  • This is a commentary, not an empirical study. It involves a critical analysis and discussion of existing literature and perspectives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The commentary engages with the arguments presented by Bornstein (2019).
  • It synthesizes existing empirical research relevant to the dimensional approach.

    • Main Results:

    • The dimensional approach is ascendant in the field, supported by strong empirical evidence.
    • Dimensional trait models can be translated into diagnoses and are easily communicated.
    • These models effectively account for intra- and interpersonal dynamics, with assessment scales already developed.

    Conclusions:

    • The empirical evidence favors the dimensional approach to personality disorders.
    • Dimensional models offer practical advantages for diagnosis, communication, and understanding dynamics.
    • Enhanced collaboration between trait and dynamic clinicians is recommended for advancing the field.