The Past, Present and Future of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Thomas O'Brien1,2, Myung Soo Park3, Jong Chan Youn4
1The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure care but remains underutilized. Multifactorial non-response necessitates multidisciplinary efforts for optimal patient outcomes with CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and electrical dyssynchrony.
- Current guidelines recommend CRT based on left ventricular systolic function, QRS duration/morphology, and functional class.
- Despite proven benefits, CRT utilization is suboptimal, and over one-third of patients do not respond adequately.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current landscape of CRT patient selection, underutilization, and non-response.
- To highlight the multifactorial nature of CRT non-response.
- To discuss strategies for improving CRT efficacy through multidisciplinary approaches and technological innovation.
Main Methods:
- Review of current guidelines and evidence for CRT patient selection.
- Analysis of factors contributing to CRT non-response.
- Discussion of emerging technologies and personalized approaches for CRT.
Main Results:
- CRT selection criteria include LVEF, QRS duration, and NYHA class.
- Significant rates of CRT non-response (over 33%) exist, defined by lack of reverse remodeling or clinical improvement.
- Causes of non-response are multifactorial, requiring a comprehensive approach.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing CRT requires addressing patient selection, procedural techniques, and post-implant care.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for overcoming CRT non-response.
- Future personalized CRT systems leveraging novel pacing and advanced imaging hold promise for tailored patient care.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has revolutionized the care of the patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony. The current guidelines for patient selection include measurement of left ventricular systolic function, QRS duration and morphology, and functional classification. Despite consistent and increasing evidence supporting CRT use in appropriate patients, CRT has been underutilized. Notwithstanding the heterogeneous definitions of non-response, more than one-third of patients demonstrate a lack of echocardiographic reverse remodeling or poor clinical outcome following CRT. Since the causes of this non-response are multifactorial, it will require multidisciplinary efforts to overcome including optimal patient selection, procedural strategies, as well as optimizing post-implant care in patients undergoing CRT. The innovations of novel pacing approaches combined with advanced imaging technologies may eventually offer a personalized CRT system uniquely tailored to each patient's dyssynchrony signature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Group Therapy
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Psychodynamic Therapy
Humanistic Therapy
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...


