Evaluation of refractive errors in retinopathy of prematurity screening

Aida Pidro1, Jasmina Alajbegović-Halimić2, Nina Jovanović1

  • 1Ophthalmology Department, Canton Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Insights

Premature children undergoing retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening frequently develop refractive errors. Lower gestational age and birth weight are linked to higher risks of hyperopia and myopia in these infants.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neonatology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Refractive errors are common in premature infants.
  • Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is crucial for early detection.
  • Understanding the link between prematurity, ROP, and refractive errors is vital for clinical management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the frequency of refractive errors in premature infants during ROP screening.
  • To investigate the association between prematurity level, ROP activity, and refractive errors.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 126 premature infants (gestational age ≤ 34 weeks, birth weight ≤ 2000 g) undergoing ROP screening.
  • Patients categorized into groups: no ROP, spontaneous regression, and active ROP.
  • Analysis of refractive error prevalence (hyperopia, myopia, astigmatism) and correlation with prematurity indicators.

Main Results:

  • 54% of infants had refractive errors, with hyperopia (35.7%) being most common.
  • Active ROP cases showed a higher incidence of myopia (40%) and hyperopia (20%).
  • Lower average gestational age and birth weight were observed in infants with active ROP and refractive errors.

Conclusions:

  • Prematurity level and birth weight are significant factors influencing refractive error development in infants.
  • Lower gestational age and birth weight increase the likelihood of hyperopia in all premature infants.
  • Myopia is particularly associated with the active form of ROP in premature infants.

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
352
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
11.8K