Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

12:03
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
8.9K
The evolution of fast track protocols after oesophagectomy
Sara Jamel1, Karina Tukanova1, Sheraz R Markar1
1Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Journal of Thoracic Disease
|May 14, 2019
Summary
Fast track protocols for oesophagectomy have evolved, improving patient recovery by reducing hospital stay and complications. Continued refinement, especially in nutrition, promises even better outcomes for esophageal cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Fast track protocols standardize patient care to enhance surgical recovery.
- Oesophagectomy protocols vary significantly due to surgical complexity.
- Understanding the evolution of these protocols is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the evolution of fast track protocols in oesophagectomy.
- To assess the impact of these evolving protocols on postoperative outcomes.
- To identify key components and trends in fast track care for oesophagectomy.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of electronic databases.
- Inclusion of 23 publications on fast track implementation in oesophagectomy.
- Inclusion of 30 publications evaluating specific fast track components.
Main Results:
- Fast track protocols for oesophagectomy have evolved consistently over time.
- Evolution has led to improvements in length of stay, anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, and mortality.
- Recent trends show increased focus on nutritional support in oesophagectomy care.
Conclusions:
- Fast track protocols for oesophagectomy demonstrate a positive evolutionary trend with improved patient outcomes.
- Variations in protocol components necessitate ongoing assessment and targeted improvements.
- Future advancements in key components, particularly nutrition, will further enhance postoperative recovery and patient experience.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
3.5K
3.5K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
8.0K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
8.0K
The Evidence for Evolution
47.7K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.7K
Convergent Evolution
31.6K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
31.6K
Eukaryotic Evolution
40.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
40.4K
Synteny and Evolution
3.8K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K

