Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

3.1K
Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
3.1K
Coordination Number and Geometry02:57

Coordination Number and Geometry

19.0K
For transition metal complexes, the coordination number determines the geometry around the central metal ion. Table 1 compares coordination numbers to molecular geometry. The most common structures of the complexes in coordination compounds are octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
19.0K
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature02:54

Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature

26.4K
In most main group element compounds, the valence electrons of the isolated atoms combine to form chemical bonds that satisfy the octet rule. For instance, the four valence electrons of carbon overlap with electrons from four hydrogen atoms to form CH4. The one valence electron leaves sodium and adds to the seven valence electrons of chlorine to form the ionic formula unit NaCl (Figure 1a). Transition metals do not normally bond in this fashion. They primarily form coordinate covalent bonds, a...
26.4K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number02:33

Lattice Centering and Coordination Number

11.4K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
11.4K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

392
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
392
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.5K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acquiring generic knowledge without induction in infancy.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The influence of task demands on joint action planning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The Social, Decoupled Self: Interpersonal Synchronization of Breathing Alters Intrapersonal Cardiorespiratory Coupling.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

How characteristics of work songs facilitate tempo-keeping in social interactions.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Representing relations between individual contributions: when does joint action planning facilitate task performance?

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Generic information supports the long-term retention of novel labels.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

11.1K

Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.

Georgina Török1, Barbara Pomiechowska1, Gergely Csibra1,2

  • 1Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University.

Psychological Science
|May 16, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People working together efficiently minimize group movement costs, not just individual ones. This study shows collective rationality in dyadic coordination, optimizing shared goals through coefficient decision-making.

Keywords:
cooperationcoordinationdecision makingefficiencyjoint actionopen datarationalitysocial cognition

More Related Videos

Optical Mapping of Action Potentials and Calcium Transients in the Mouse Heart
08:13

Optical Mapping of Action Potentials and Calcium Transients in the Mouse Heart

Published on: September 13, 2011

28.1K
Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
14:13

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing

Published on: May 6, 2014

18.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

11.1K
Optical Mapping of Action Potentials and Calcium Transients in the Mouse Heart
08:13

Optical Mapping of Action Potentials and Calcium Transients in the Mouse Heart

Published on: September 13, 2011

28.1K
Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
14:13

Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing

Published on: May 6, 2014

18.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Individuals often exhibit efficient movement behaviors to minimize costs.
  • The efficiency of group coordination and collective decision-making remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether dyads coordinate efficiently by minimizing aggregate movement costs.
  • To determine if individuals prioritize group efficiency over personal or partner's individual cost minimization.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel touch-screen-based sequential object-transfer task.
  • Experimental manipulation of coordination scenarios to observe path choices in dyads.
  • Measurement of individual and aggregate movement costs during task performance.

Main Results:

  • Participants did not solely minimize their own or their partner's movement costs.
  • Dyads demonstrated coefficient decision-making, selecting paths that minimized total group movement costs.
  • Evidence suggests a motivation for collectively rational outcomes in cooperative tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Human dyads are capable of and motivated towards collectively rational decision-making.
  • Group efficiency in cooperative tasks is achieved through optimizing aggregate costs, not just individual ones.
  • Findings highlight the emergent properties of cooperative behavior in achieving shared goals.