Comparison of maximal isometric forearm supination torque in two elbow positions between subjects with and without...

Study Design: Cross-sectional comparison. Introduction: Forearm supination range of motion is often limited by short or stiff pronators. Many studies have examined maximal isometric forearm supination torque (MIFST). However, there is little research comparing MIFST in two elbow positions between subjects with and without limited forearm supination range of motion (LSR). Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to compare MIFST in two elbow positions (90º flexed elbow, extended elbow) between subjects with and without LSR. Methods: Thirteen right-handed subjects (seven men, six women) with LSR and 13 age- and gender-matched healthy controls participated in this study. The forearm supination range of motion and MIFST were measured using a Smart KEMA system. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare MIFST in two elbow positions between subjects with and without LSR. Results: No significant difference between groups (p > .05) was found. However, there was an interaction effect between elbow position and group on MIFST (p < .05). Independent t-tests were used to confirm the simple effects. In the LSR group, the value of MIFST was significantly lower in the elbow-extended position than in the group without LSR (p < .05). Conclusions: These findings indicate that elbow position should be considered when assessing the strength or increasing the strength of the supinator muscle, especially in patients with LSR.