Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

A Screening Method for Identification of Heterochromatin-Promoting Drugs Using Drosophila
Published on: March 12, 2020
Implementing screening interventions in community pharmacy to promote interprofessional coordination of primary care
Kevin P Mc Namara1, Ines Krass2, Gregory M Peterson3
1School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Background:
Screening is a critical component of efforts to reduce the population burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), by facilitating early use of cost-effective prevention and treatment strategies. While international evidence suggests that screening in community pharmacies improves screening access and identifies at-risk individuals, concerns from medical organisations about the absence of interdisciplinary coordination and related lack of continuity of care with general practice have significantly contributed to reluctance from some stakeholders to endorse, and engage with, pharmacy-based screening initiatives. The Cardiovascular Absolute Risk Screening (CARS) study was designed to address these challenges and promote an interprofessional approach to screening for cardiovascular disease risk by pharmacists. This study describes the impact of the CARS implementation model on interdisciplinary coordination and continuity of care.
Methods:
In addition to clinical training, pharmacists at eleven participating pharmacies were provided with implementation training, resources and support to promote interprofessional coordination. Completion of training and pharmacy implementation plans, both of which highlighted GP engagement strategies, were pre-requisites for screening commencement. Using mixed methods approaches, data were analyzed from screening records (n = 388), researcher interviews with patients at 6-10 weeks post-screening (n = 248, 64%), and pharmacist interviews (n = 10).
Results:
Screening records suggested that 94% of screened individuals were advised to seek formal GP assessment, and 98% consented to sharing of results. Among interviewed participants, 81% recalled direct pharmacist action to facilitate GP engagement. Among interviewees who had seen their GP already (n = 70), 79% reported that their GP was aware of the results (another 16% were uncertain). Pharmacists reported positive GP feedback stemming from efforts at early engagement, but an absence of ongoing collaboration.
Conclusions:
Use of implementation planning by pharmacists, alongside clinical training, can effectively promote an interdisciplinary coordination focus by pharmacists.
More Related Videos
06:02A Low-Cost Method of Measuring the In Situ Primary Productivity of Periphyton Communities of Lentic Waters
Published on: December 16, 2022
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care