Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Published on: January 12, 2019
Clinical Use of the Pictorial Baxter Retching Faces Scale for the Measurement of Postoperative Nausea in Children
Mehernoor F Watcha1,2, Andrew D Lee2, Eduardo Medellin2
1From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Insights
The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale reliably assesses nausea in children aged 6 and older. A BARF score of 4 or higher indicates a need for antiemetic therapy, aiding in pediatric postoperative nausea management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pain and Palliative Care
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- Pediatric postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) are challenging to evaluate objectively.
- Vomiting is often used as a proxy for nausea, potentially leading to undertreatment.
- The Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale offers a validated method for quantifying pediatric nausea intensity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the clinical utility of the BARF scale in assessing pediatric PONV and PDNV.
- To establish the minimum age for reliable BARF scale use.
- To identify the BARF score threshold indicating a need for antiemetic therapy and the minimum clinically relevant change.
Main Methods:
- Children rated nausea severity using the BARF and visual analog scales preoperatively, in the postanesthesia care unit, and postdischarge.
- Changes in nausea were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, with queries about the need for rescue antiemetics.
- Test-retest reliability and predictive validity for antiemetic need were examined.
Main Results:
- Children aged 6 years and older demonstrated consistently reliable use of the BARF scale (100% vs. 77.6% for <6 years).
- A BARF score of 4 showed 80.0% sensitivity and 85.6% specificity for predicting the need for antiemetics.
- The minimum clinically relevant difference was 1.47, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.56.
Conclusions:
- The pictorial BARF scale is clinically useful and easy to administer in children aged 6 and older.
- A BARF score of 4 or higher signifies a patient-identified need for rescue antiemetics.
- The study highlights that significant nausea in children is frequent but may be overlooked if not accompanied by vomiting.
Background:
Because nausea is difficult to evaluate in children, vomiting is used as the objective clinical end point in managing pediatric postoperative nausea and vomiting and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV). The recently developed pictorial Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale has content, construct, and convergent validity in quantifying pediatric nausea intensity. We determined its clinical usefulness in assessing pediatric postoperative nausea and vomiting and PDNV, establishing the lowest age associated with consistently reliable use, the score at which patients identify a need for therapy, and the minimum clinically relevant change in scores, and examined its test-retest reliability.
Methods:
We obtained subject ratings of the severity of their nausea using the BARF and visual analog scales in the preoperative, postanesthesia care unit and postdischarge phases. Changes in nausea were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, along with responses to queries of a need for rescue antiemetics at these time points.
Results:
Children ≥6 years of age had a consistently reliable ability to use the BARF scale (132/132 [100%] vs 59/76 [77.6%] for children ≥6 and <6 years of age, respectively, Fisher exact test, P < .001). The BARF scale had excellent performance in predicting patient-perceived need for antiemetics, with a score of 4 having 80.0% sensitivity and 85.6% specificity. The minimum clinically relevant difference in BARF scores was 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-2.1). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.73).The BARF scale identified 60 of 192 (31.3%) children as having postoperative nausea in the postanesthesia care unit, with severe nausea (score >6) in 13 (6.7%). Emesis occurred in 8 (4.1%). Rescue antiemetics were administered to 16 (8.3%), including 2 with severe emesis (≥3 episodes) but in only 2 of 11 (18.2%) with severe nausea without vomiting. PDNV was reported in 39 of the 99 who returned diaries (39.4%), with nausea in 34 (34.3%), severe nausea in 15 (15.2 %), and emesis in 16 (16.2%).
Conclusions:
The pictorial BARF scale is easy to use in the clinical setting by children ≥6 years of age, has a minimum clinically relevant difference of 1.47, with scores of 4 or higher associated with a patient-identified need for rescue antiemetics. Assessment of postoperative nausea by the BARF scale has shown that clinically significant nausea occurs frequently in children but is not always treated unless accompanied by vomiting.
Related Concept Videos
pH Scale
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Scaling
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

