Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How can good general practitioner care be achieved?

D C Morrell, M O Roland

    British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
    |January 17, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A critical review of the evidence for a pain-spasm-pain cycle in spinal disorders.

    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
    Same author

    Improving the quality of mental health services in Personal Medical Services pilots: a longitudinal qualitative study.

    Quality & safety in health care·2004
    Same author

    Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems.

    Quality & safety in health care·2003
    Same author

    Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries?

    Quality & safety in health care·2003
    Same author

    Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.

    Quality & safety in health care·2002
    Same author

    Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance.

    Quality & safety in health care·2002
    Same journal

    Early retirement for consultants.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    From COMAR: Essential troika of teaching, research, and clinical care.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Parliament's two way pull on the NHS.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Conference Report: After the summit.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Council election: South Western regional vacancy 1988-90.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Health managers support taxation based service.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    See all related articles

    General practitioners need at least 10-minute consultations for high-quality care. To maintain this standard, average patient list sizes should not exceed 1750, especially in high-demand areas.

    Area of Science:

    • General Practice
    • Healthcare Management
    • Primary Care Medicine

    Background:

    • Providing high-quality general practitioner (GP) care necessitates adequate consultation times.
    • Current healthcare policies suggest a range of services that impact GP workload.
    • Assessing optimal patient list sizes is crucial for sustainable primary care.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the maximum patient list size a GP can manage while maintaining a high standard of care.
    • To establish evidence-based recommendations for GP list sizes and service provision.
    • To inform policy regarding resource allocation and quality standards in general practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Calculations based on consulting time, consultation rates, and patient list sizes.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeling assumed a minimum consultation interval of 10 minutes.
  • Analysis considered factors of demand and need in different practice areas.

    • Main Results:

    • A maximum patient list size of approximately 1750 is suggested for GPs to provide high-quality care.
    • Lower list sizes are recommended for areas with high patient demand and need.
    • The study highlights the importance of adequate consultation time in workload calculations.

    Conclusions:

    • Average GP list sizes should ideally be capped at 1750 to ensure quality care.
    • Minimum standards for practice facilities, records, and accessibility are essential.
    • Effective healthcare management requires balancing patient lists with service provision demands.