Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Joo Myung Lee1, Ki Hong Choi1, Bon-Kwon Koo2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Combining fractional flow reserve (FFR) and high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) improves risk prediction in coronary artery disease. High-risk plaque features significantly increase adverse events in patients with FFR >0.80, suggesting integrated assessment is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Risk
Background:
- Ischemia and high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) are key prognostic factors in coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Limited data exist on the combined prognostic value of physiological stenosis severity (FFR) and CTA-defined HRPC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between physiological stenosis severity (FFR) and coronary CTA-defined HRPC.
- To assess the prognostic implications of HRPC based on physiological stenosis severity in CAD patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 772 vessels (299 patients) using coronary CTA and FFR.
- Assessment of HRPC (e.g., minimum lumen area <4 mm², plaque burden ≥70%, low attenuating plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcification).
- Comparison of vessel-oriented composite outcomes (VOCO) at 5 years based on HRPC count and FFR categories.
Main Results:
- Lesions with ≥3 HRPC decreased significantly as FFR values increased (p<0.001).
- Both FFR and HRPC count were associated with VOCO risk (p=0.008 and p=0.023, respectively).
- In the FFR >0.80 group, ≥3 HRPC lesions had higher VOCO risk (15.0% vs 4.3%, HR=3.964; p=0.007), independently associated with VOCO.
Conclusions:
- Physiological stenosis severity and HRPC are closely related and predict clinical events.
- The prognostic impact of HRPC varies with FFR, being significant only in the FFR >0.80 group.
- Integrating FFR and HRPC offers superior prognostic stratification, particularly for patients with FFR >0.80.
Background:
Although the presence of ischemia is a key prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease, the presence of high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) is also associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Limited data exist regarding the prognostic implications of combined information on physiological stenosis severity assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and plaque vulnerability by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-defined HRPC.
Objectives:
The current study aimed to evaluate the: 1) association between physiological stenosis severity and coronary CTA-defined HRPC; and 2) prognostic implications of coronary CTA-defined HRPC according to physiological stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease.
Methods:
A total of 772 vessels (299 patients) evaluated by both coronary CTA and FFR were analyzed. The presence and number of HRPC (minimum lumen area <4 mm2, plaque burden ≥70%, low attenuating plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, or spotty calcification) were assessed using coronary CTA images. The risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO) (a composite of vessel-related ischemia-driven revascularization, vessel-related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death) at 5 years was compared according to the number of HRPC and FFR categories.
Results:
The proportion of lesions with ≥3 HRPC was significantly decreased according to the increase in FFR values (58.6%, 46.5%, 36.8%, 15.7%, and 3.5% for FFR ≤0.60, 0.61 to ≤0.70, 0.71 to ≤0.80, 0.81 to ≤0.90, and >0.90, respectively; overall p value <0.001). Both FFR and number of HRPC showed significant association with the estimated risk of VOCO (p = 0.008 and p = 0.023, respectively). In the FFR >0.80 group, lesions with ≥3 HRPC showed significantly higher risk of VOCO than those with <3 HRPC (15.0% vs. 4.3%; hazard ratio: 3.964; 95% confidence interval: 1.451 to 10.828; p = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of VOCO according to HRPC in the FFR ≤0.80 group. By multivariable analysis, the presence of ≥3 HRPC was independently associated with the risk of VOCO in the FFR >0.80 group.
Conclusions:
Physiological stenosis severity and the number of HRPC were closely related, and both components had significant association with the risk of clinical events. However, the prognostic implication of HRPC was different according to FFR. Integration of both physiological stenosis severity and plaque vulnerability would provide better prognostic stratification of patients than either individual component alone, especially in patients with FFR >0.80. (Clinical Implication of 3-vessel Fractional Flow Reserve [3V FFR-FRIENDS study]; NCT01621438).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction


