Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

Dysrhythmias, also known as arrhythmias, are disturbances in the heart's rhythm that range from benign to life-threatening. A thorough evaluation is crucial for appropriate management and involves a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, and various diagnostic tests.Medical HistorySymptoms: Collect detailed information on palpitations, dizziness, syncope, chest pain, and fatigue. Note their onset, frequency, and triggers.Previous Cardiac Issues: Document any history of heart...

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often...

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Options for the Forensic Mental Health Evaluator When Retaining Counsel Is Impaired.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same author

Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2025

Same author

Maximizing Reflexive Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Testing of HCV Antibody-Reactive Samples Within United States Public Health Laboratories.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2023

Same author

Collateral Consequences for Third-Party Interviewees in Forensic Contexts.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2023

Same author

Trauma-Focused Mitigation Testimony in Capital Sentencing Hearings.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2021

Same author

The Gold Standard and the Pyrite Principle: Toward a Supplemental Frame of Reference.

Frontiers in psychology·2020

Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

Published on: November 14, 2018

Distractions in Forensic Evaluations.

Stanley L Brodsky¹, Lauren N Johnson²

¹Dr. Brodsky is Professor Emeritus and Ms. Johnson is a graduate student, Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. biminip@gmail.com.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

|May 18, 2019

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic assessments in jails and prisons often lack quiet environments, impacting evaluations. This study examines distractions, guidelines, research, and management strategies for these challenging settings.

More Related Videos

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model

Published on: November 14, 2018

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Legal Psychology

Background:

Professional guidelines mandate quiet, private, distraction-free environments for forensic assessments.
Jail and prison settings rarely meet these ideal conditions, posing significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the problem of distractions in correctional facility forensic assessments.
To explore guidelines, research, and management strategies for conducting evaluations in high-distraction environments.

Main Methods:

Review of professional guidelines (American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, American Psychological Association).
Analysis of test manuals and relevant literature on distractions.
Exploration of research findings on the effects of environmental distractions.
Discussion of practical considerations for reporting, managing distractions, and conceptualizing evaluation tasks.

Main Results:

Examples of common noise and distractions in correctional settings are provided.
Relevant guidelines and research findings highlight the negative impact of distractions on assessment validity.
Strategies for managing distractions, examinee habituation, and examiner awareness are discussed.

Conclusions:

Conducting forensic assessments in high-distraction environments like jails and prisons presents unique challenges.
Adapting assessment procedures and reporting methods is crucial for maintaining the integrity of evaluations in these settings.