Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Isolating Malignant and Non-Malignant B Cells from lck:eGFP Zebrafish
Published on: February 22, 2019
Target-Specific Imaging of Cathepsin and S100A8/A9 Reflects Specific Features of Malignancy and Enables Estimation of
Anne Helfen1, Nils Große Hokamp2, Christiane Geyer1,3
1Translational Research Imaging Center, Institute of Clinical Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Muenster and University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Purpose:
Tumor development and metastasis are dependent on tumor infiltrating immune cells which form a characteristic tumor microenvironment (TME). Activated monocytes secrete the protein heterodimer S100A8/A9 promoting TME formation. Monocyte-dependent proteases facilitate local tumor cell invasion by degradation of the extracellular matrix. We aimed for target specific in vivo imaging of S100A8 and proteases to provide differentiating biomarkers for local tumor growth and metastatic potential.
Procedures:
Murine breast cancer cells of the 4T1 model with graduated metastatic potential (4T1 and 4T07: both hematogenous metastasis > 168FAR: lymph-node metastasis > 67NR: no metastasis) were orthotopically implanted into female BALB/c mice. At 4 mm size, tumors were investigated by injecting the protease-specific probe ProSense 750EX (PerkinElmer, 4T1 n = 7, 4T07 n = 10, 168FAR n = 16, 67NR n = 15) and anti-S100A8-Cy5.5 (n = 6 each) and performing fluorescence reflectance imaging at 0 and 24 h after injection. In vivo imaging was validated with immunohistochemistry.
Results:
At 24 h, S100A8-specific signals in 4T1 and 4T07 were significantly higher (1714.05/1683.45 AU) as compared to 168FAR and 67NR (174.85/167.95 AU, p = 0.0012/p = 0.0003), reflecting the capability of hematogenous spread. Protease-specific signals were significantly higher in 4T1 and 4T07 (348.01/409.93 AU) as compared to 168FAR (214.91 AU) and 67NR (129.78 AU p < 0.0001 each), reflecting local vessel invasion and tumor cell shedding. Immunohistology supported the in vivo imaging results.
Conclusions:
Non-invasive in vivo imaging of S100A8 and monocytic proteases allows for differentiation of the tumors' local invasive and systemic metastatic potential in reflecting the TME formation. While proteases augment local tumor cell invasion, solid metastases seem to be dependent on a pro-tumoral microenvironment.
More Related Videos
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023
08:57Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Specific Heat
For example, increasing the temperature of one gram of water by 1°C requires one calorie of heat energy and can be written as 1 cal/g-°C, or...
Cell Specific Gene Expression
Cell Specific Gene Expression
Density, Specific Weight, Specific Gravity and Compressibility of Fluid
Specific weight represents the weight per unit volume and is calculated by multiplying...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...