Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

470
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
470
Correlations02:20

Correlations

35.7K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
35.7K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.3K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.3K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

14.6K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
14.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.1K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.4K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Meta-awareness, mind-wandering, and the control of automatic external and internal orientations of attention.

Communications biology·2026
Same authorSame journal

Hierarchical systems in the default mode network when reasoning about self and other mental states.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Scaffolding human and AI instruction: Neural alignment and learning gains in online education.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Temporal structure of natural language processing in the human brain corresponds to layered hierarchy of large language models.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Motor activation in cue-guided behavior: Neural evidence from human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT).

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

A predictive processing framework for joint action and communication.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same journal

Multimodal correlates of socioemotional movie-watching and their associations with internalizing symptoms in childhood and adulthood.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Emotional Information Recruits Specific Neural Dynamics to Support Hierarchical Cognitive Control.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Humanness as Social Normativity: Neural Evidence that Humanized Faces Align with Gender Schemas.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Making new connections: An fNIRS machine learning classification study of inter-brain synchrony in the default mode network.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Attentional Biases in Self-Control Are Associated with Reward Cue-Related Brain Activity.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.

Samuel A Nastase1, Valeria Gazzola2,3, Uri Hasson1

  • 1Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|May 18, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces intersubject correlation (ISC) analysis to measure shared brain activity between individuals. This method reveals how our brains represent information together, enhancing our understanding of social cognition and neuroscience.

Keywords:
communicationfMRInaturalistic stimulireliabilitysocial cognition

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Joint information representation is fundamental to social experience.
  • Measuring shared brain activity is crucial for understanding social cognition.
  • Traditional methods struggle with dynamic, naturalistic scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and explain intersubject correlation (ISC) analysis.
  • To demonstrate ISC's utility in measuring shared neural information across individuals.
  • To extend ISC to functional network estimation and distributed patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging one individual's brain activity to model another's.
  • Applying experimental manipulations to study shared responses (e.g., speaker-listener).
  • Extending ISC to analyze spatially distributed patterns and functional networks.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrates the feasibility of measuring shared brain information in naturalistic settings.
  • Highlights ISC's ability to capture shared responses between perception and recall.
  • Provides a framework for functional network estimation using ISC.

Conclusions:

  • Intersubject correlation (ISC) analysis is a powerful tool for neuroscience.
  • ISC facilitates the study of shared neural representations in social contexts.
  • This tutorial offers methodological considerations and best practices for ISC analysis.