Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
Conceptual Framework for Therapeutic Development Beyond Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in Urothelial Cancer
Petros Grivas1, Alexandra Drakaki2, Terence W Friedlander3
11 From the University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Abstract:
Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care in advanced urothelial cancer, but long-term outcomes have remained poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, with their favorable toxicity profiles and noteworthy efficacy, have steered a new era in advanced urothelial cancer, with five agents targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, most patients do not achieve response, whereas immunotherapy-related adverse events may cause morbidity, increased health care use, and-rarely-mortality. Therefore, there is an urgent need for additional therapeutic modalities across the disease spectrum. A plethora of clinical trials are ongoing in various disease settings, including chemotherapy regimens, radiotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, agents targeting additional immune checkpoint pathways, vaccine, cytokines, adoptive cell therapies, as well as targeted and anti-angiogenic agents. Two agents, enfortumab vedotin and erdafitinib, have breakthrough designation by the FDA but are not approved yet (at the time of this paper's preparation). Novel combinations with various treatment modalities and optimal sequencing of active therapies are being investigated in prospective clinical trials. Evaluation of new treatments has met with substantial challenges for many reasons, for example, molecular heterogeneity, clonal evolution, and genomic instability. In the era of precision molecular medicine, and because patients do not respond uniformly to current therapies, there is a growing need for identification and validation of biomarkers that can accurately predict treatment response and assist in patient selection. Here, we review current updates and future directions of experimental therapeutics in urothelial cancer, including examples (but not an exhaustive list) of ongoing clinical trials.
Insights
Advanced urothelial cancer treatments are evolving beyond chemotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibitors show promise, new therapies and biomarkers are crucial for improving patient outcomes and overcoming treatment resistance.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Urothelial Carcinoma Research
Background:
- Platinum-based chemotherapy offers limited long-term benefits for advanced urothelial cancer.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have emerged as a new standard, with five FDA-approved agents.
- Despite ICI efficacy, many patients do not respond, and immunotherapy-related adverse events pose risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current updates and future directions in experimental therapeutics for urothelial cancer.
- To highlight the urgent need for novel treatment modalities and predictive biomarkers.
- To discuss ongoing clinical trials exploring diverse therapeutic strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and ongoing clinical trials in urothelial cancer therapeutics.
- Analysis of emerging treatment modalities including antibody-drug conjugates, targeted agents, and novel combinations.
- Discussion of challenges in treatment evaluation, such as molecular heterogeneity and genomic instability.
Main Results:
- Several novel therapeutic approaches are under investigation, including antibody-drug conjugates (enfortumab vedotin) and targeted agents (erdafitinib).
- Ongoing trials explore combinations of various treatment modalities and optimal sequencing of therapies.
- Identification and validation of biomarkers are critical for predicting treatment response and guiding patient selection in precision medicine.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant unmet need for improved therapeutic options in advanced urothelial cancer.
- Ongoing research focuses on diverse experimental therapeutics, including novel combinations and targeted agents.
- Biomarker development is essential for personalized treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:43Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
10:18Author Spotlight: Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems
Therapeutic Index