Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Implant Insertion Time and Incision Length in Breast Augmentation Surgery with the Keller Funnel: Results from a
Paolo Montemurro1, Sebastian Fischer1, Sybille Schyllander1
1Akademikliniken, Storängsvägen 10, 11452, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background:
The Keller funnel is an easy-to-use mechanical device that aids breast implant insertion. This study analyzed implant insertion time and incision length using the Keller funnel versus conventional manual insertion.
Methods:
This was an analysis of two cohorts of adult patients undergoing primary breast augmentation with anatomical implants at a single center. In the 'insertion time cohort' (N = 20), implants were inserted with a Keller funnel on one side and manually on the other; follow-up lasted 4 years. In the 'incision length cohort,' both implants were inserted with a Keller funnel (N = 50) or manually (N = 50), with follow-up lasting 12 months.
Results:
In the insertion time cohort, mean total insertion time (from implant sterile-package opening to final positioning in the pocket) was 35 s (range 13-76 s) with the Keller funnel and 25 s (range 13-43 s) using manual insertion (p = 0.07); the mean time needed to push the implant through the incision was 6 s (range 3-10 s) with the Keller funnel and 16 s (range 13-40 s) with manual insertion (p = 0.04). In the incision length cohort, mean incision length was shorter with the Keller funnel versus manual insertion (35.5 ± 2.1 mm vs. 46.2 ± 3.2 mm; p < 0.001). There were no differences in complications based on insertion method.
Conclusion:
The Keller funnel was associated with decreased incision length and reduced time to push the implant through the incision. This brings potential clinical advantages in minimizing scarring and reducing contamination of the device.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
Porin Insertion in the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane
Three models describe the assembly of porins by the SAM complex and their insertion into the outer membrane. Model 1 suggests that porins are assembled outside the SAM channel as the...

