Feeding and Mobility Traits Influence Grasshopper Vulnerability to Agricultural Production in the Cape Floristic...

To be able to foretell which species will be at risk of extinction from possible expansion of agriculture into natural areas, we need to determine how land use affects animal groups especially insects with different life history traits. Intuitively, we can predict that the proportion of specialist versus generalist grasshoppers and widespread versus localised species can be an indicator of change in vegetation patterns in a landscape. As a result, the study examined the relationship between the extent of range distribution and mobility of grasshoppers and land-use type in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) biodiversity hotspot. It aimed at examining grasshopper assemblage composition in association with different land uses. We specifically related the number and type of sites occupied by grasshopper species to their mobility and distribution type to find out which characters improve species survival under highly modified habitats. Grasshopper assemblages were dominated by highly mobile generalists that tolerated transformed landscapes, and mostly geographically widespread. This contrasts with the low- to medium-mobile, range-restricted specialists, which make up close to 30% of the total collection, with a lower tolerance for anthropogenically modified landscapes in the CFR. This study also reveal that the fynbos biome is an important habitat for low-mobility and range-restricted species, and hence require conscious conservation efforts to conserve such species to prevent possible future biotic erosion and homogenisation in this hotspot. This result can be used to assess the possible extent of biotic erosion or otherwise in order to recommend better conservation efforts in the CFR.