Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 21, 2024
In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow
Mark B M Hofman1, Manouk J A Rodenburg1, Karin Markenroth Bloch2,3
1Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ICaR-VU, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging velocity offset errors are clinically relevant. This study validates an interpolation-based correction method, significantly reducing errors without time-consuming phantom scans.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Medical Imaging Physics
- Flow Quantification
Background:
- Velocity offset errors in phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging affect clinical flow volume assessment.
- These errors are clinically relevant across systems and cannot be eliminated by protocol optimization.
- Phantom-based correction methods are time-consuming and rely on system reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate an in-vivo, interpolation-based velocity offset correction method for CMR.
- To assess the efficacy of this correction method in a multi-vendor, multi-center setting.
- To compare the performance of different spatial interpolation orders.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated data from six 1.5T CMR systems (multi-vendor).
- Acquired 2D flow studies in the aorta and pulmonary artery, with phantom measurements.
- Applied interpolation-based offset correction to in-vivo data, excluding wraparound regions.
Main Results:
- Included 126 flow measurements in 82 subjects; 98 studies met inclusion criteria after quality checks.
- Pre-correction cardiac output error was -5 ± 16%.
- Post-correction, remaining offset velocity was 0.1 ± 0.5 cm/s, with a 0 ± 5% cardiac output error.
Conclusions:
- Interpolation-based offset correction effectively reduces velocity offset errors in CMR.
- This method offers comparable efficacy to phantom correction but is more time-efficient.
- The validated method provides accurate flow quantification in a clinical setting.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multi-Step Reactions
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved...
Resonance

