Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments01:12

Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments

5.7K
The cytoskeleton is a complex dynamic structure performing varied functions based on cellular requirements. The adaptability of the individual filaments in the cytoskeleton determines their ability to perform various functions within the cell. It can undergo rapid reorganization during processes like cell division or remain stable for several hours as in the interphase. The adaptability of these filaments depends on stringent regulatory mechanisms. The microfilament and microtubules of the...
5.7K
Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

1.3K
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations,...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conditional Reliability of Weighted Test Scores on a Bounded <i>D</i>-Scale.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

The Dominant Trait Profile Method of Scoring Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Scalable Career & Educational Growth Transitions: Developing a Mentoring Network & Engaging with an Online Mentoring Platform.

The chronicle of mentoring & coaching·2024
Same author

Latent <i>D</i>-Scoring Modeling: Estimation of Item and Person Parameters.

Educational and psychological measurement·2023
Same author

The Response Vector for Mastery Method of Standard Setting.

Educational and psychological measurement·2022
Same author

Testing for Differential Item Functioning Under the <i>D</i>-Scoring Method.

Educational and psychological measurement·2022
Same journal

A Simple Approach for Differential Test Functioning Based on Sum Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Factor Retention in Large Factor Analysis Models: A Simulation Study Comparing 15 Methods.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Agreement and Alignment in Binary Rating Tasks: Strategic Convergence as an Equilibrium Outcome.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Interactions Between Termination Criteria and Ability Estimators in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Identification and Diagnosis of Misreporting in Surveys.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The Aggregated Latent Profile Index: Measuring Person Profile Differentiation Within a Bootstrap-Validated Latent Profile Space.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.3K

A Note on the D-Scoring Method Adapted for Polytomous Test Items.

Dimiter M Dimitrov1,2, Yong Luo2

  • 1George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|May 21, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a D-scoring method for polytomous items, extending previous work on binary items. The new approach yields ability scores and item category functions comparable to the graded response model in item response theory.

Keywords:
D-scoring methodgraded response modelpolytomous itemstest scoring

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.3K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • The D-scoring method was previously established for binary items as an analog to basic item response theory (IRT) models.
  • Many assessments utilize polytomous items, necessitating an extension of D-scoring methodologies.
  • Item response theory (IRT) provides a framework for understanding item and test characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present an approach for D-scoring of polytomous items.
  • To compare the results of the proposed D-scoring method with those obtained using the graded response model (GRM) in IRT.
  • To establish a unified framework for the psychometric analysis of tests containing both binary and polytomous items.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes generating 'virtual' binary items from polytomous items to apply the D-scoring method.
  • This approach is situated within the item response theory (IRT) framework.
  • The proposed method is evaluated by comparing its outcomes with the graded response model (GRM).

Main Results:

  • The D-scoring approach with virtual binary items produces ability scores consistent with the graded response model (GRM).
  • Item category response functions derived from this method are analogous to those obtained under the GRM.
  • The proposed method offers a unified framework for D-scoring and psychometric analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The developed D-scoring method effectively handles polytomous items by converting them into virtual binary items.
  • This approach provides psychometric properties (ability scores, item category response functions) that align with established IRT models like GRM.
  • The unified framework enhances the efficiency and applicability of D-scoring across diverse educational and psychological assessment scenarios.