Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatic Fibrosis Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and AI
Published on: July 21, 2023
Noninvasive inflammatory markers for assessing liver fibrosis stage in autoimmune hepatitis patients
Xiaoling Yuan1,2, Sheng-Zhong Duan3,4,5, Junying Cao1
1Department of Infectious Disease, Ninth People's Hospital.
Objective:
To examine the accuracy of noninvasive inflammatory markers in predicting liver fibrosis stage in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).
Patients And Methods:
We enrolled 55 patients with AIH and 60 healthy controls in this study, and divided them into three groups: F0 (control); F1-F3 (noncirrhotic fibrosis); and F4 (cirrhosis). The following markers were analyzed for all participants: lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio (LNR); lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR); lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); immunoglobulin-to-platelet ratio (IGPR); aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI); aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR); and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4). The predictive accuracy of these noninvasive markers was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were used to analyze associations between the noninvasive markers and liver fibrosis stage.
Results:
AAR, LPR, LMR, IGPR, APRI, and FIB-4 were linked to liver fibrosis-stage (P < 0.05), with correlation indices of - 0.219, 0.258, - 0.149, 0.647, 0.841, and 0.704, respectively, but not LNR (P = 0.093). area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of LPR, IGPR, AAR, LMR, APRI, and FIB-4 for detecting cirrhosis (F4 vs. F0-F3) were 0.936 (95% confidence interval: 0.870-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.939 (0.875-1.000, P < 0.001), 0.528 (0.319-0.738, P = 0.768), 0.555 (0.409-0.700, P = 0.568), 0.798 (0.694-0.902, P = 0.002), and 0.881 (0.796-0.967, P < 0.001). Our multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage, with a coefficient of 0.385 (95% confidence interval: 0.103-0.667, P = 0.007) and 14.903 (2.091-27.786, P = 0.023), respectively.
Conclusion:
LPR and IGPR were associated independently with liver fibrosis stage in treatment-naive AIH, and were superior to APRI and FIB-4 in detecting cirrhosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment

