Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

08:43
Three-dimensional Inflammatory Human Tissue Equivalents of Gingiva
Published on: April 3, 2018
[Reproducibility and evaluation of gingival indices]
Summary
Gingival bleeding indications are reliable for assessing gum inflammation, especially when confirmed by multiple examiners. The P.M.A. index is a reliable method for evaluating gingival inflammation.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Oral Health
Background:
- Gingival inflammation assessment is crucial for diagnosing periodontal disease.
- Subjective patient reports and objective indices are used to evaluate gingival health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of patient-reported gingival bleeding as an indicator of gingival inflammation.
- To assess the reliability of the P.M.A. index and the Sulcus Bleeding Index in measuring gingival inflammation.
Main Methods:
- Patients' subjective reports of gingival bleeding were collected.
- The P.M.A. index was used to assess gingival inflammation.
- The Sulcus Bleeding Index was also considered for assessment.
Main Results:
- Patient indications of gingival bleeding were found to be highly reliable when corroborated by three independent examiners.
- The P.M.A. index demonstrated sufficient reliability in assessing gingival inflammation.
- The Sulcus Bleeding Index's reliability was not evaluated in this study.
Conclusions:
- Patient-reported gingival bleeding is a reliable subjective measure of gingival inflammation.
- The P.M.A. index is a reliable tool for objectively assessing gingival inflammation.

