Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

1.4K
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
1.4K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.2K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.2K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.4K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.1K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.6K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.3K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mezigdomide, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (SUCCESSOR-2): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)Ā·2026
Same author

'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' Effector SDE525 hijacks NACĪ± to Suppress Jasmonic Acid-Mediated Immunity in Citrus.

Molecular plant pathologyĀ·2026
Same author

Photocatalytic Regioselective Alkylation of 4-Alkenylpyridines via Delocalized Pyridinyl Radicals.

Organic lettersĀ·2026
Same author

4-Methylcatechol attenuates diabetic myocardial disorder via the ESR1-PI3K-AKT pathway.

Frontiers in pharmacologyĀ·2026
Same author

How Do Open-Ended Interview and Closed-Ended Questionnaire Responses Compare? A Matched Mixed-Methods Study Examining Treatment Attitudes of Patients With Meniscal Tear and Persistent Pain.

ACR open rheumatologyĀ·2026
Same author

Single-cell RNA sequencing-guided drug discovery to alleviate radiotherapy-induced esophageal toxicity.

Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. BĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
06:32

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.8K

Estimation of data adaptive minimal clinically important difference with a nonconvex optimization procedure.

Zehua Zhou1, Jiwei Zhao1, Leslie J Bisson2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|May 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed a new data-adaptive method to estimate minimal clinically important significance, overcoming limitations of previous classification techniques for biomedical conclusions beyond statistical significance.

Keywords:
Minimal clinically important differencedata adaptivenonconvex optimizationsurrogate loss

More Related Videos

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.2K
P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

936

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
06:32

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.8K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.2K
P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

936

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Significance
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Statistical significance alone has limitations for biomedical conclusions.
  • Minimal clinically important significance (MCIS) is crucial for assessing clinical impact.
  • Previous methods, like Hedayat et al.'s, rely on balanced outcome assumptions that are not always met.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel data-adaptive method for estimating MCIS.
  • To overcome the balanced outcome assumption limitation of prior classification techniques.
  • To provide a more flexible, individual-level estimation of MCIS.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a data-adaptive statistical approach for MCIS estimation.
  • Employed a faster gradient-based algorithm for computation.
  • Utilized a flexible individual-level structure for MCIS.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively estimates MCIS without the balanced outcome assumption.
  • Simulation studies demonstrated the method's usefulness and superior performance.
  • Application to chondral lesions and meniscus procedures confirmed its practical value.

Conclusions:

  • The new data-adaptive method offers a robust alternative for estimating MCIS.
  • It enhances the ability to draw meaningful biomedical conclusions from clinical data.
  • This approach advances the assessment of clinical significance in patient-centered research.