Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Patient involvement in consultation for atrial fibrillation - the cardiologists' perspective
Ulla Hellström Muhli1, Jan Trost1, Eleni Siouta2,3
1Department of Sociology, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden.
Insights
Swedish cardiologists describe patient involvement in atrial fibrillation (AF) consultations through various practices. True shared decision-making requires equal power, which is challenging to achieve in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Sociology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Patient involvement in medical consultations is increasingly recognized as crucial for effective treatment.
- Shared decision-making (SDM) aims to align treatment plans with patient values and preferences.
- Understanding healthcare providers' perspectives is key to improving patient engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze how Swedish cardiologists perceive and implement patient involvement in atrial fibrillation (AF) consultations.
- To explore cardiologists' understanding and familiarity with the concept of shared decision-making (SDM).
Main Methods:
- A descriptive qualitative study design was employed.
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten cardiologists across four Swedish hospitals.
- Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze interview data.
Main Results:
- Cardiologists described patient involvement using themes of persuasive practice, protective practice, professional role, and medical craftsmanship.
- "Shared decision-making" was understood as reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement.
- The ideal of equal power between patient and cardiologist for SDM is difficult to guarantee in practice.
Conclusions:
- Descriptive qualitative content analysis effectively revealed cardiologists' perspectives on patient involvement and SDM.
- Cardiologists should prioritize patient involvement in AF treatment decisions to meet patient expectations.
- Recognizing patients as active participants is fundamental for successful patient involvement and SDM.
Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the accounts of Swedish cardiologists concerning patient involvement in consultations for atrial fibrillation (AF). The questions were: how cardiologists handle and provide scope for patient involvement in medical consultations regarding AF treatment and how cardiologists describe their familiarity with shared decision-making.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
A descriptive study was designed. Ten interviews with cardiologists at four Swedish hospitals were held, and a qualitative content analysis was performed on the collected data.
Findings:
The analysis shows cardiologists' accounts of persuasive practice, protective practice, professional role and medical craftsmanship when it comes to patient involvement and shared decision-making. The term "shared decision-making" implies a concept of not only making one decision but also ensuring that it is finalised with a satisfactory agreement between both parties involved, the patient as well as the cardiologist. In order for the idea of patient involvement to be fulfilled, the two parties involved must have equal power, which can never actually be guaranteed.
Research Limitations/Implications:
Methodologically, this paper reflects the special contribution that can be made by the research design of descriptive qualitative content analysis (Krippendorff, 2004) to reveal and understand cardiologists' perspectives on patient involvement and participation in medical consultation and shared decision-making. The utility of this kind of analysis is to find what cardiologists said and how they arrived at their understanding about patient involvement. Accordingly, there is no quantification in this type of research.
Practical Implications:
Cardiologists should prioritise patient involvement and participation in decision-making regarding AF treatment decisions in consultations when trying to meet the request of patient involvement.
Originality/Value:
Theoretically, the authors have learned that the patient involvement and shared decision-making requires the ability to see patients as active participants in the medical consultation process.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
01:27Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
01:28Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
01:25Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
01:29Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
01:29Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care