School-Based Telepsychiatry in an Urban Setting: Efficiency and Satisfaction with Care

Given the shortage of child psychiatrists in most areas, telepsychiatry may increase accessibility of psychiatric care in schools, in part by improving psychiatrists' efficiency and reach. The current study assessed consumer and provider satisfaction with school-based telepsychiatry versus in-person sessions in 25 urban public schools and compared the efficiency of these service delivery models. In total, 714 satisfaction surveys were completed by parents, students, school clinicians, and child psychiatrists following initial (26.3%) and follow-up (67.2%) visits (6.4% did not indicate type of visit). Most of these surveyed visits were for medication management (69.9%) or initiation of medication (22%). Efficiency analyses compared time saved via telepsychiatry versus in-person care. Researchers also conducted focus groups with providers to clarify preferences and concerns about telepsychiatry versus in-person visits. : Consumers were highly satisfied with both in-person and telepsychiatry-provided school psychiatry services and showed no significant differences in preference. Providers reported both in-person and telepsychiatry were equally effective and showed a slight preference for in-person sessions, citing concerns about ease of video equipment use. Telepsychiatry services were more efficient than in-person services, as commute/setup occupied about 28 psychiatrist hours total per month. Findings suggest that students, parents, and school clinicians perceive school-based telepsychiatry positively and equal to on-site care. Child psychiatrists have apprehension about using equipment, so equipment training/preparation and provision of technical support are needed. Implications of study findings for telepsychiatry training and implementation in schools are discussed.