Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Isolation of Cancer Stem Cells From Human Prostate Cancer Samples
Published on: March 14, 2014
Prostate cancer screening: guidelines review and laboratory issues
Xavier Filella1,2, María Dolores Albaladejo3,4, Juan Antonio Allué3,5
1Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine Commission and Biological Markers of Cancer Commission, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain.
Clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer (PCa) screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) often omit crucial laboratory details. Improving guideline quality requires better integration of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical factors in their development.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a key biomarker for early prostate cancer (PCa) detection.
- Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to integrate evidence into practice, especially for controversial PCa screening.
- Divergent guidelines exist, and opportunistic screening is not advised.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for prostate cancer (PCa) screening using PSA.
- To evaluate the inclusion and consideration of laboratory-specific issues within these guidelines.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of CPGs for PSA-based PCa screening published since 2008 was conducted.
- Twenty-two updated CPGs were assessed using a checklist for laboratory factors (pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical).
- Guideline quality was evaluated based on evidence grading and algorithm clarity.
Main Results:
- Only 59% of guidelines graded recommendations by evidence level, and 18% provided clear algorithms.
- Laboratory medicine specialists were involved in only 9% of reviewed guidelines.
- Laboratory issues were frequently omitted; only two guidelines considered WHO standards for PSA testing.
Conclusions:
- The quality of PCa early detection guidelines can be significantly enhanced.
- Greater consideration of laboratory issues, including pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical factors, is essential for guideline development.
- Incorporating expertise from laboratory medicine specialists and addressing standardization is crucial for improving PCa screening guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve

