Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.4K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

50.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
50.9K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
What is a Species?01:17

What is a Species?

49.5K
Overview
49.5K
Keystone Species01:39

Keystone Species

24.2K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
24.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

80.9K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
80.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive multi-model ensembles for improved epidemic projections and decision support.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Local Influenza Forecasts Outperform State-Level Forecasts in the United States.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Assessing the Impact of Timing and Coverage of United States COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns: A Multi-Model Approach.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Estimated impact of 2022-2023 influenza vaccines on annual hospital burden in the United States.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Improving outbreak forecasts through model augmentation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Modeling Influenza Antiviral Strategies: Reducing Burden and Preventing Resistance.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Uncertainty analysis of species distribution models.

Xi Chen1, Nedialko B Dimitrov1, Lauren Ancel Meyers2,3

  • 1Graduate Program in Operations Research Industrial Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.

Plos One
|May 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed a faster analytical method to quantify uncertainty in species distribution models. This approach accurately estimates the variance of maximum entropy model outputs, crucial for ecological predictions and disease vector suitability assessments.

More Related Videos

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.8K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K
Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.8K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Biogeography
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Species distribution models (SDMs), such as the maximum entropy model, predict species' geographic ranges using occurrence data and environmental variables.
  • Standard SDMs provide point estimates of species presence probability but lack inherent measures of uncertainty.
  • Quantifying uncertainty is vital for reliable ecological predictions and public health applications, like disease vector mapping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analytically derive the variance of maximum entropy model outputs from input data variance.
  • To introduce a novel, computationally efficient method for assessing prediction uncertainty in SDMs.
  • To apply the analytical method to estimate uncertainty in dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti suitability.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical derivation of the variance for maximum entropy model outputs based on input variable variance.
  • Application of the analytical method to dengue occurrence and Aedes aegypti abundance data, incorporating demographic and environmental factors.
  • Comparison of the analytical method's performance against the bootstrap method and Poisson point process model.

Main Results:

  • The analytical method successfully derived the variance of maximum entropy model outputs, providing standard deviations for dengue importation probability and Aedes aegypti suitability.
  • The analytical method demonstrated equivalence with the bootstrap and Poisson point process models under assumptions of independent point locations.
  • The introduced analytical method is significantly faster than the bootstrap method for calculating uncertainty in maximum entropy models.

Conclusions:

  • The developed analytical method provides a computationally efficient and accurate way to quantify uncertainty in maximum entropy SDMs.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of species distribution predictions, particularly for applications in disease ecology and vector-borne disease risk assessment.
  • The method offers a direct and rapid alternative to computationally intensive techniques like bootstrapping for uncertainty estimation.