Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Histological Quantification to Determine Lung Fungal Burden in Experimental Aspergillosis
Published on: March 9, 2018
Catheter burden following urogynecologic surgery
Alexis A Dieter1, Jennifer M Wu1, Jessica L Gage1
1Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Postoperative catheterization burden was similar for women using indwelling Foley catheters versus clean intermittent self-catheterization after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Both methods showed comparable difficulty, embarrassment, and infection rates.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
- Postoperative Care
Background:
- Limited data exists on women's experiences with postoperative catheterization after urogynecologic surgery.
- Assessing the burden of postoperative catheterization is increasingly important for patient-centered care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the catheter burden in women who self-selected indwelling Foley catheter use versus clean intermittent self-catheterization for managing voiding dysfunction post-pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Main Methods:
- A nested study within a randomized controlled trial involving women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence surgery.
- Participants not passing their voiding trial were discharged with either an indwelling Foley catheter or self-catheterization based on preference.
- Catheter burden was assessed using the Short-Term Catheter Burden Questionnaire, measuring difficulty and embarrassment.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in total catheter burden, difficulty of use, or embarrassment between the indwelling Foley catheter and self-catheterization groups.
- Urinary tract infection rates were similar between groups (23% vs 30%).
- Women with indwelling catheters had more clinic visits, while those with self-catheterization had more phone calls.
Conclusions:
- Indwelling Foley catheterization and clean intermittent self-catheterization present similar catheter burden, difficulty, and embarrassment for women post-pelvic reconstructive surgery.
- Both methods demonstrate comparable urinary tract infection rates.
- Patient preference may guide the choice of catheterization method without significantly impacting patient-reported outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:33Intubation, Central Venous Catheter, and Arterial Line Placement in Swine for Translational Research in Abdominal Transplantation Surgery
Published on: February 3, 2023
12:37Surgical Placement of Catheters for Long-term Cardiovascular Exercise Testing in Swine
Published on: February 9, 2016