Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Quantification of Social Behavior in Adult Rats
Published on: December 14, 2014
No. 380-Investigation and Management of Prenatally Identified Microcephaly
Isabelle De Bie1, Isabelle Boucoiran1
1Montréal, QC.
Objective:
To update Canadian maternity care and reproductive health care providers on the diagnostic criteria of fetal microcephaly and provide information on the relevant investigations, prognosis, and pre- and perinatal management of this prenatal finding.
Intended Users:
All maternity care (most responsible health provider [MRHP]) and pediatric providers; genetic counsellors; maternity nurses; nurse practitioners; provincial maternity care administrators; medical students; postgraduate residents, and fellows.
Outcomes:
To provide better counselling and appropriate clinical management to women and families who have received a prenatal diagnosis of fetal microcephaly.
Evidence:
Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2018, using appropriate key words (prenatal ultrasound, prenatal imaging, fetal, antenatal, or prenatal microcephaly). Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles.
Search Period:
Seven years (2010-2018); completed final search April 19, 2018. The primary author completed validation of the articles.
Benefits, Harms, And Costs:
This document educates readers about (1) the diagnostic criteria for fetal microcephaly, (2) its potential etiologies, (3) investigation and management options both pre- and postnatally. It proposes an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of prenatally detected microcephaly. These recommendations are based on expert opinion and have not been subjected to a health economics assessment. Local or provincial implementation will be required. The authors recognize that there is variability across Canada in access to the cited services and resources. As such, these recommendations were developed in an attempt to promote access and to provide guidance for all provinces and territories across the country.
Values:
The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Related Concept Videos
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Tonsillitis II: Management
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Management of Insomnia
Managing Impressions
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic...

