Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Global childhood cancer survival estimates and priority-setting: a simulation-based analysis
Zachary J Ward1, Jennifer M Yeh2, Nickhill Bhakta3
1Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Global childhood cancer survival is 37.4%, with significant regional disparities. Improving treatment access and quality through policy interventions can substantially increase survival rates, especially with a comprehensive approach.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Pediatric Oncology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate childhood cancer survival estimates are vital for global health policy and clinical decision-making.
- Significant regional variations in childhood cancer survival necessitate understanding underlying barriers.
- Estimating global survival and identifying factors influencing outcomes is crucial for improving pediatric cancer care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate global childhood cancer survival rates.
- To account for clinical and epidemiologic factors impacting survival.
- To model the potential impact of policy interventions on improving survival outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Developed a microsimulation model for 200 countries, incorporating clinical and treatment variables.
- Calibrated the model using CONCORD-2 and CONCORD-3 study data via Approximate Bayesian Computation.
- Estimated 5-year net survival and simulated gains from seven policy interventions.
Main Results:
- Global 5-year net childhood cancer survival is estimated at 37.4%, with survival rates varying widely by region (e.g., 8.1% in Eastern Africa to 83.0% in North America).
- Individual policy interventions showed modest survival gains, while bundled interventions significantly improved outcomes.
- A comprehensive systems approach with full implementation of interventions could achieve 80.8% 5-year net survival.
Conclusions:
- Childhood cancer survival is highly variable globally, with particularly low rates in Africa.
- Improving access to treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) and addressing financial toxicity are critical.
- Investments in quality of care at health-system and facility levels are essential for enhancing global childhood cancer outcomes.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Global Climate Change