Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: Epidemiologic Insights and Perspectives
Dong Hoon Lee1, Edward L Giovannucci2,3,4
1Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. dhlee@mail.harvard.edu.
Purpose Of Review:
Controversy exists whether excess body fatness (measured by body mass index (BMI)) is associated with better cancer survival ("obesity paradox"). Here, we review the obesity paradox in cancer research and discuss potential explanations and future research directions.
Recent Findings:
Overweight and obese cancer patients have better survival for diverse cancers. This apparent obesity paradox may be largely explained by methodological limitations including reverse causation, selection bias, confounding, and reliance of BMI as a measure of adiposity in cancer patients. A growing number of studies show promising evidence that precisely quantified body composition can provide important prognostic information in cancer care, such that low muscle and high adiposity are associated with worse clinical outcomes in cancer patients. The term obesity paradox in cancer, implying a causally beneficial role of adiposity, is misleading. Understanding the role of muscle and adiposity may reduce the confusion and inform precision oncology care.
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Introduction to Epidemiology
Causality in Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

