Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

6.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
6.2K
Mass and Weight01:19

Mass and Weight

15.2K
Mass and weight are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation. For example,  medical records often show our weight in kilograms, but never in the correct units of newtons. In physics, however, there is an important distinction. Weight is the pull of the Earth on an object. It depends on the distance from the center of the Earth. Weight dramatically varies if we leave the Earth's surface, unlike mass, which does not vary with location. On the Moon, for example, the...
15.2K
Atomic Weight01:25

Atomic Weight

11.8K
Protons and neutrons have approximately the same mass, about 1.67 × 10-24 grams. Scientists arbitrarily define this amount of mass as one atomic mass unit (amu) or one Dalton. Electrons are much smaller in mass than protons, weighing only 9.11 × 10-28 grams, or about 1/1800 of an atomic mass unit. As a result, they do not contribute much to an element's overall atomic mass. This means that, when considering atomic mass, it is customary to ignore the mass of any electrons and...
11.8K
Apparent Weight01:09

Apparent Weight

9.8K
True weight is the measure of the gravitational force acting on an object. However, if the object accelerates, its measured weight is different from its true weight. Similar observations can be made when the object is submerged in water. An object's weight in water is its apparent weight, which is equal to the difference between its true weight and the buoyant forces.
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
9.8K
Cable Subjected to Its Own Weight01:13

Cable Subjected to Its Own Weight

786
Overhead power transmission lines rely on cables to carry electricity across large distances. To ensure the stability and functionality of these lines, it is crucial to understand the shape and tension experienced by the cables under the influence of their weight.
A generalized loading function is employed to analyze a cable subjected to its own weight. This function considers the force acting along the cable's arc length rather than its projected length, providing a more accurate...
786
Polymers: Defining Molecular Weight01:01

Polymers: Defining Molecular Weight

3.8K
Unlike small molecules with definite molecular weights, polymers are a mixture of individual polymer chains of varying lengths, each with a unique molecular weight.  So, the molecular weight of a polymer is expressed as an average value based on the average size of the polymer chains. The two most common forms of averages used for polymers are the number average molecular weight and weight average molecular weight.
The number average molecular weight (Mn) is the summation of the number...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust Modestly Weighted Log-Rank Tests.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Estimating the Variance of Covariate-Adjusted Estimators of Average Treatment Effects in Clinical Trials With Binary Endpoints.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Bayesian Solutions for Assessing Differential Effects in Biomarker Positive and Negative Subgroups.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Visualizing hypothesis tests in survival analysis under anticipated delayed effects.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Digital twins and Bayesian dynamic borrowing: Two recent approaches for incorporating historical control data.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

The MaxCombo Test Severely Violates the Type I Error Rate.

JAMA oncology·2023
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Liver Ischemia in Mice
05:53

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Liver Ischemia in Mice

Published on: August 7, 2012

16.4K

Modestly weighted logrank tests.

Dominic Magirr1, Carl-Fredrik Burman1

  • 1Advanced Analytics Centre, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce novel weighted logrank tests (WLRTs) to prevent falsely concluding a new drug is superior when it is actually worse. These new tests maintain high power for delayed effects while remaining efficient for proportional hazards.

Keywords:
drug regulationimmuno-oncologynonproportional hazardsweighted logrank test

More Related Videos

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Isolated Renal Artery Occlusion
07:54

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Isolated Renal Artery Occlusion

Published on: July 19, 2011

16.5K
Use of a Hanging Weight System for Coronary Artery Occlusion in Mice
08:30

Use of a Hanging Weight System for Coronary Artery Occlusion in Mice

Published on: April 19, 2011

22.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Liver Ischemia in Mice
05:53

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Liver Ischemia in Mice

Published on: August 7, 2012

16.4K
Use of a Hanging-weight System for Isolated Renal Artery Occlusion
07:54

Use of a Hanging-weight System for Isolated Renal Artery Occlusion

Published on: July 19, 2011

16.5K
Use of a Hanging Weight System for Coronary Artery Occlusion in Mice
08:30

Use of a Hanging Weight System for Coronary Artery Occlusion in Mice

Published on: April 19, 2011

22.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • The standard logrank test is widely used for comparing survival data in clinical trials.
  • Weighted logrank tests (WLRTs) offer flexibility but may not always control Type I error rates, particularly when treatment effects are not immediate.
  • Ensuring the reliability of clinical trial conclusions is paramount for patient safety and drug development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new class of weighted logrank tests (WLRTs) that rigorously control the risk of falsely identifying a new drug as more efficacious than standard care.
  • To develop statistical tests that maintain high power in scenarios with delayed treatment effects.
  • To ensure these new tests are nearly as efficient as the standard logrank test under proportional hazards assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel class of weighted logrank tests (WLRTs).
  • Theoretical analysis of Type I error control under various treatment effect scenarios, including delayed onset.
  • Power and efficiency comparisons with the standard logrank test and existing WLRTs.

Main Results:

  • The proposed WLRTs effectively control the risk of concluding a new drug is superior when it is uniformly inferior.
  • This error control is not guaranteed by WLRTs in general.
  • The new tests demonstrate high power for delayed-onset treatment effects and high efficiency under proportional hazards.

Conclusions:

  • A new class of weighted logrank tests provides robust Type I error control in clinical trial survival analysis.
  • These tests offer a reliable alternative for evaluating new drugs, especially when delayed treatment effects are anticipated.
  • The proposed methodology enhances the safety and accuracy of drug efficacy assessments in comparative studies.