Using medico-legal claims for quality improvement in maternity care: application and revision of an NHSLA coding taxonomy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026
Determining the Role of Maternally-Expressed Genes in Early Development with Maternal Crispants
Published on: December 21, 2021
B M Nowotny1,2, S Basnayake3, K Lorenz4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences, The Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Objective:
To validate the NHSLA maternity claims taxonomy at the level of a single maternity service and assess its ability to direct quality improvement.
Design:
Qualitative descriptive study.
Setting:
Medico-legal claims between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2016 from a maternity service in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia.
Population:
All obstetric claims and incident notifications occurring within the date range were included for analysis.
Methods:
De-identified claims and notifications data were derived from the files of the insurer of Victorian public health services. Data included claim date, incident date and summary, and claim cost. All reported issues were coded using the NHSLA taxonomy and the lead issue identified.
Main Outcome Measures:
Rate of claims and notifications, relative frequency of issues, a revised taxonomy.
Results:
A combined total of 265 claims and incidents were reported during the 6 years. Of these 59 were excluded, leaving 198 medico-legal events for analysis (1.66 events/1000 births). The costs for all claims was $46.7 million. The most common claim issues were related to management of labour (n = 63, $17.7 million), cardiotocographic interpretation (n = 43, $24.4 million), and stillbirth (n = 35, $656,750). The original NHSLA classification was not sufficiently detailed to inform care improvement programmes. A revised taxonomy and coding flowchart is presented.
Conclusions:
Systematic analysis of obstetric medico-legal claims data can potentially be used to inform quality and safety improvement.
Tweetable Abstract:
New taxonomy to target health improvement from maternity claims based on NHSLA Ten Years of Maternity Claims.
Related Concept Videos
01:31Taxonomy
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
01:20Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
01:29Modern Molecular Taxonomy
01:11Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
01:24Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
01:19Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...